Laserfiche WebLink
-� <br />,Va . <br />• <br />F?inufes of Regular Council Meeting March I3, i978 <br />Page three <br />Oeveioper proposes to move sign to another st4e about June Ist; <br />repor'ted that the Board of Appeals recommends approvai of the request <br />provided the top of the sign is no higher than 8 feet aDove grade. <br />Mi11E� reported that the Pianning Commission recommends approval <br />of the existing sign at its prasent location on Lot 23, Block i, <br />uni-il June i, f978; Commission prefers to review the sign and Its <br />proposed location �rhen slg� is to be relocated. <br />• After discuss(on, Hanson moved, seconded by Crichton. that Council <br />concur with the Planning Commission°s recommendatfon to appro�e the <br />temparary 4' X 8' sign as presently loceted on the house on Lot <br />23, Biock t, Karth Lake Estates untii June I, 1978. Motion carried <br />unantmously. <br />• QDeveloper Efbenstetner noted that the house on Lat 23, Block i, <br />was slted at 50' from the front property Itne, to minimize the <br />sef back difference betMeen the exisi-ing house to the south (at 60') <br />and the 40' front se� back minimum, estabtished by ordlnance.) . <br />Counctl concurred that the <br />be referred to the Planning <br />recommendations to Counctl. <br />t <br />appare�t problems of the Sign Ordinance <br />Commisston 4or its consideration and <br />Miller referred Council to his report of 2/22/78, noti�g that the <br />reduced setback from 40 teet to 30 feet is requested to reduce <br />grading of #he slope along Karth Lake and to minimize tree removai. <br />Mltler reviewed the 4 cross-sections of representative lats, <br />prepared by the surveyors. <br />Eibensteiner said the variances would pro�ide flexi6ilifiy in sit€ng <br />. the homes and enable the deve0oper to provide setback unFtormity; <br />ai! Iots are butldabie, xithout the varfances, but extensive grading <br />and fitl wtll be necessary on some; expfained that 10 ofi the 20 lots <br />will need the 10' variances, 5 a 5° variance and 5 homes wtll be <br />at the AO' minimum setback. Eibenstein.er said that homes on lats 31, <br />38, 39, 43 and 44 a!I! be at the 40' required front setback.' <br />After dlscussion. Crtchton moved, seco�ded by Woodburn, that CounciB <br />autho�ize a front setback varfance of t0° on each of i0 lots, and <br />a front sefi4ack variance of up to 5' on each of 5 lo7s, of the 20 <br />requested in the application. Motfon carried unanimousiy. <br />�a�o �.�. .v-c rreso rerian nvmes - si n varlanCe <br />Milier referred Council to his report of 2 22 78 and to sign <br />application, noting that the sign is existing a�d cooforms to setback, <br />height and area requireme�ts for other districts; signs of this type <br />• are not permitted by ordinance in residentiai zones, so request ts <br />really for a waiver of Section 8 of Ordinance No. 76, rather than <br />far a veriance. Milier noted 4hat the sign, as sited. eliminates <br />aimost entirely any visual impact on #Ae adjacent residential <br />communfty, <br />Mtller reported that the Board ot Appeals and Planning Commission <br />recommend approval 04 the stg� as locatad. <br />Woodburn moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council approve the waiver <br />of Section 8 of Ordinance No. 76 and approve the Presbyterlan Homes <br />sEga as sited (Case No. 78-2). Motion carried un�,��imously. <br />REPORT OF ViLLAGE TREASURER OONALD LAMB <br />Investments <br />March ?, t978 - E100,040 in American National $ank at 6.60� for <br />30 days. <br />Hanson moved that CounctB ratify the investment as reported by <br />Vtllage Treasurer Lamb. Motion rras secooded by Crichton and <br />carried unanimously. <br />lamb distributed l978 cash tlow proJections to Council for its <br />consideratlons. <br />_3_ <br />