CC 10-12-1959 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� • 11 • with Improvement Pto. 1 and is }�eing carried forward in Inprcvement ido. 2. Thus, in Nc. 3, the entire amount of the bonds, essuming $35C,�00 wculd be sold and� of course� if it's not necessary to have $35C,0�0 only that portion that we need, that would all be paid by apecial assQssments. Now, in order to break that down� you will find it in No. 5. a. ts abutting sewer per foct. That is, if you h�ve a lot� for example, it would ba $10.50 per front foct for ittnnediate complete service. Those in 5 b. will be assessed who den't get immediate serviee but bansfit from what is called an area benefit where their laterals ars not there but there is trunk benefit which is called non-abutting platted pronerty per front fcct cf �2.5C. ;Jon abutting unplatted property is $4CC.00 an aere which is � an acreage charqe which is a factor on larga piac�s of property that dcn't get all the latQrals. The service connectio?n stub is the service connection frcm the middle of the street to the property lina at a cost of 550.00. Ne�r:, translating this in another way� the mill rate increase would be "none" and the annual service charqe in Pdo. 7- that is ihe estimated cost that will have tc b� charged by the villagQ cfficials after they adopt a rates and charges ordinance for the o�eraticn of the sewer department. 7his $36.00 takes into consideratian all cf the costs that Roseville will charge which also reflects the charges that St. Paul charges plus the normal depreciation, maintenance of your system. This $36.UG was the � same figure we used in ccnnection with Imgrovement No. l. There aren�t tcc many cannections in Imprcvement Na. 1 and whila there ar� somewhat mcre in idc. 2 it isn't what we call a full fledged system.