Laserfiche WebLink
• • 31 <br />• abcve average wida lot but the sewage that ycu put into th� sys,em <br />is nc mcre than a small lot but I�ay mcre. Is th�re any way <br />v+here it has bean done +he_e it's assessed on the prcperty cwner <br />lil:e a blank charge as my properticr, of th� tctal cost instead cf <br />fc,ctage cost? <br />MhYOR ASH3ACH: That, of ccurse, I think has be�n partly explained <br />and that is up to nur Ccuncil cr viltage pciicy hcw they d� this scrt cf <br />thing. I've been wrestling with these things for yuite a while. <br />That's a decisicn to be made yet and I don't know if any ono human <br />being alive can say which is the most fair way cf dcing it. The <br />Council has not yet decided how tc handle that situaticn in every <br />case. There aze so muny different cases. <br />MR. WESTPHAL; K'ith regard to the cverall plan, is there any <br />• possibility of the future developmer,t cf the coaanunities tc the <br />north - and this is lcnq range pianning - increasing in size <br />sufficiently and in pcpulation to the pcint whore they may need <br />sewoge systems. �"le're at thQ end cf the line here the way this <br />has been designed. �^.e'rs on eight inch lfnas. Cibviously you <br />cn't hook on anything smallez than that and hcck on anythinq fxcm <br />nerth cf th� tracks. Ne're at the end cf the lin� with respeet <br />t� this combined Roseville and St. Pau1 system. If, f cr example, <br />the peo^le ncrth cf here want a sewage system, thay are going to <br />have to put in their �:,�m sewage disposal plant r.r conceive ethax <br />means cf moving on tc Minneapolis or New Brightcn or whatever else <br />they may have u� ncrth. <br />la�t. POPUVICH: I think you're antici,r.ating something that <br />• recent facts might dispel this wcrry. The Mounds View Village, <br />which is tc the west of us. aro now proceeding with a water and <br />sewer study which will not hcok up inte Roseville because of the <br />