CC 10-12-1959 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

❑ � 34 • imroediate problem and this is the beat way we know to beat it. N�t, :t�c�TPFiP.L: There is ne planned alt�rnative. say in 5 to 10 years, cf gcing tc something cther than this. 'Ihis is sompthing unpredictable at this time. �:,A.YOR ASHBACH: It's like a pclitician trying to figure cut something. M�i. �rE5TPHAL: I'd like tc say as a citizen cf the area I think it's a good idea 6ut as a man who's gcing to pay the exp�nse cn tay ov,n place which is a�new hcuse very adeyuately designed to tdke care cf my preblems, and my vaater system is apparently adeyuate as is just abcut everybody here as far as pcllution. There have been a lct of wells gcing dry. I would have te say I'm personally opposed. N'R. �AA".E:S r,. LP.f.G� 32=.0 Idew Brightor, Re�d: I want tc qo on � record as cp�csing this at this time. i think �ve have � few matteTs te decidg, cne cf which is the prcblem of assessment that hasn't been settled. The cther rne is the matter cf ccnnsctien from the street. 7�e have talked rather locsely about two �r thxee cr cne 9C degree bends ceming out at the back cf th� hcuse to get to the street. I dcn't believe a great many peopl.e know what the crst might be involved if they had to go info manhol�s. (inaudible) if that wculd be mandatory cr if it wculdn't or if they hav� tc tear up the floor and go through the house. This touid cast a lot more than g2CG.0�. I'm c�n1_y aqainst this propossl bacause I don't think we know enough about it. I think it'e qood foz the area but we have to know what we're gcdng to pay. Nov�, as tc the matter of assessments an a front faot basis, I have haard tavaral say thoy • have large lots. So have I. I'm not going to get as much bentfit frcm tha sewer as somabody cn a 5U foot lot. I would nevez have to