My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 04-14-1969
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1969
>
CC 04-14-1969
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 9:32:52 AM
Creation date
11/27/2006 9:49:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />f+IR. RICHARD PED�RSOiV, 1224 AmU12 Road (Spoke before) : <br />Asked if someone could relate the trailer court service to an <br />individual home since the trailers are packed in tight and there <br />would be a tremendous amount of use. <br />D7R. ORVILLE CARLSON, 4355 Highway 10: Asked what the <br />assessment formula would be on lots 300 feet deep. <br />FROM THE AUDIENCEe Question re assessing a lot over 200 <br />feet deep where a house could never be conetructed }aeyond the <br />• first 200 feet. <br />MR. WILLIAM FEYEREISESd, 4262 North Hamlinee Asked if non- <br />abutting property owners would be given credit for the assess- <br />ments already paid when the laterals are constructed, <br />MR. WILLIAi�I REEVES, 1877 �Tolton, Falcon Heights (Owns <br />property on Highway 96): Asked if sewer would be constructed to <br />serve Highway 96. <br />NiRS. WILLIAM REEVES, 1877 iiolton, Falcon Heights (Spoke <br />before)e They plan to build on their Highway 96 property. <br />Asked if there was any possibility of having the sewer con- <br />structed there, Asked what procedure should be followed relative <br />to suhmitting a petition. <br />P+I�R. RICHARD PEDERSOide 1224 Amble Road (Spoke before): <br />Asked for a clarification of assessment for non-abutting property. <br />MRS. GERALD GRUDNOSKE, 4471 Highway 10 (Spoke before)s <br />Asked £or how long the total assessment would remain only <br />$10.00 a foot. Also aksed for an explanation as to why an <br />additional area could not be added to the improvement. <br />M12. EMIL i�1ELSOiv, relator, representing the Johnsons who had <br />recently opened up a subdivision on Ham2ine Avenue and Floral <br />nrivee Asked if the land west of Hamline Avenue could be con- <br />sidered for a sanitary sewer improvement. <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.