Laserfiche WebLink
! <br />� <br />i�iR. RE:{ � CLU�1G, 4370 iVorth Senlling (Spoke before) : <br />Opposed to the improvement. It's too big an expenditure to <br />undertake at this time. <br />FROM THE AUDIEiJCE> Asked what the co-petitioner Griffis, <br />Inc, is planning to build on their property. <br />�iR. AMOS GALE, 4223 N. iiamlinee Owns 10 acres and asked a <br />question re assessments. Indica�.ed he felt a 7% carrying charge <br />on unpaid assessments was excessive. <br />FROi� TT� AUDIE�7CE: Suggested that it would be an expensive <br />improvement if the Griffis company is only planning to build a <br />motel. <br />NiR, TdILLIAM FEYEREISETJ, 4262 Ldorth Y3amline (Spoke before) : <br />Rsked about crediting partial assessments against the total <br />assessment for immediate service. <br />NIItS. GERALD GRUDDTOSI�, 4471 Aighway 10 (Spoke before) e <br />Opposed to the improvement and since the Griffis petitioners <br />have no immediate plans for their property, suggested that the <br />improvement is not needed at this time. <br />i�1R. JOE BUSSARD, 4335 Tiighway l0e T�Tot objecting to the <br />improvement. <br />iti7R. HAROLD THORb7ES, 4519 Lakeshore Placea In favor of the <br />improvement. Also suggeste3 that the sewer lines along Round <br />Lake go to the rear of the property. <br />iw1R5. WILLIANi REEVES, 1877 Holton, Falcon Heightse It would <br />cost much less to put sewer and water in at the same ti.me. <br />Suggested that the Council wait and put both in at the same <br />time. <br />171R. JOF�iT GRUDNOSS�, 4439 Highway l0e Comments about <br />effluent from Twin Cities Arsenal. <br />f�IRS. ROBERT WILSON, �6�3 Highway 10 (Spoke before)a Even 3f <br />the sewer would cost more 10 years from naw, there would be more <br />people in the area to help pay the cost. <br />❑ <br />