Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />Mfnutes of Reg,ular Counci i Meetinc� Oci�ober 9, f979 <br />Page Pour <br />� <br />an 8' high fenCe wtthln 5'-5' ofi the County Road F roadway; <br />�oted that the',8pplicant 5aid the area along Conr�try Road F is <br />carreni�ly ussd'to park amployees' cars - this parkirsg coul4 be <br />r�-located or� the siie. Mr. Berry {Ca(umbia T�ansit? safd he <br />wouid have no probtem with moving the fence iine i5± feet back <br />from the prpperty tEne; noi��d thst the area along Coun?y Road F <br />and the aesfi prop�rty (ine is utiiized for parking by Mounds View <br />High School #eachers - this parking is onfy during the day and <br />does not need i-o be fenced; concern for security is between 10 p.m. <br />and morning �hen the facility is nat Tn operation. <br />Vlingert adviseq that the operat€on is in_a non-conforming s#atus <br />' {Industriai u,-� tn R-I District'); noted that tha proposed chsin link <br />�ence wit! nofi'improve fihe laoks of the si?e ar screan the buses <br />�rom view; feets there is Jus�ification to.prateCt an existing <br />business (�ven',�thougit non-conforming); fee�s it wcsutd be in tfie <br />public in�fierest t� p rotect the schaol bus operation agaEnst <br />vandalism as wei! as interference with fihe bus ser�ice.. <br />Grichton quss#%oned ahether permitting constrUc�ton of a fence <br />on non-conformt,ng proparty (s 5et41ng an undes9rabl� pPecedent wfitch <br />vrll! b� a di4fi'cuiY compiicatio� to resotve in 4he future, when and <br />if expansion o� the use ts destrad; suggested iY may be more de- <br />sira4iA: to flrs? consider re-zoEiing of �the property ip accord <br />xith. the existt',ng use. <br />3�ingert said he aould not favor rezoning; . s�a�85tea that the <br />applfeani- recan'ssider tbe tence focat3on on the County Road F siQe <br />of the•praperty and 5Gb!!�{$ a spe�i#ic tence iocstion for Council's <br />considoration,s'houing dfinensions, ahich wi1{ provide suffictent <br />maneuvering room on the site for �Phe �us operations, and recess <br />?he fence as fa',r from the County Road F property f3ne as (s feasfble <br />and stiii provf'de the needed securi?y. -- -.. <br />Berry iodieatad'he wouid �repare ?he revised draming for cortsldeca#ion <br />at the Octcaber 29th Counctt meeiing, <br />-6. Vartances for RBlilOdflled Nn�iao .. <br />Architect Eldon'Marr3son presented redised house pians for re- <br />pEacement Uf th� existing cottage at Ib'!$ Johanna 8ivd.; noi�ed <br />they Aave �etarmtned 4hat ?he original house ts not worth saving. <br />�n revievr af 4Me site ptan, E�orrison discribed the �oi� as "very <br />minfnai"; variaelces have bean rede�c3d tn best utiilze the properfiy <br />and sfii►t provide a Iivabie, �sses�t6ally two-bedroom house; noted <br />fihat thre� off-street parking spaces are provided (I deep across <br />driveway?. , <br />Wingert r�pcsr�Ped that the 0oard or Hppeals had reViewed an earlier <br />plan presenta�tiaa which fhey cons�dered to be too farge s house <br />e��th foe� �xtonsi,ve variaac�s; repc�r�ed 4hat the revised pl�ns <br />have tsken these' cos�cerns into account, and the Pianning Co�nmiss%on <br />• rocomme;�ds approva[ of #he remafnlne� vartances:trAi:eha�re: . <br />. 5g aggrega�e sidayard �� �� " ', �`'�""�""-�"'eg.� <br />�0° front (streetsldeD���e�-�, <br />16° raar (lak� side? ..I.-e7-L�..��a�',e�a�e.u.en..� ,. <br />Nlir�gert r�pc�rted that the Plann[ng Commission concarred that the <br />�'e�+ised pPan is the best u�iiization 6f this sceb-sYandard lot, <br />ahtch sa4isfies the criteria reGueste� in previous plan revFexs, <br />��s�gert moved, sgeond d by Hansons Yh�� CO�payCj i appp.eyv9 �he 5' <br />a99re9�ts ��deyar+d� f�ont and t6p resr setbac <br />Per plans preseni�ed (October 3, 1979), Motion car�r6��mpu�ly, <br />�' 3a�� �`�`I�°-� �.�,^^s-J ? �1' .�ee. �e.�h G�-r,� �; s �"°""� `� �o a�` <br />q <br />