Laserfiche WebLink
� :� � <br />f�i!'rJUTES OF SP€C 1 Al COUNC I L (�1EET i NG <br />Village of Arden Hilis <br />�fonday, October I, 1979 - 7;30 p.m. <br />Village Hall <br />Call to Order <br />Pursuant to due cait ard notice 4hereof, D4ayor Crepeau called <br />the maeting to order a�+ 7:34 p.m. <br />Roll Call <br />Preseni - t4ayor Flenry J. Crepeau, <br />' ' Charlfe Crichton, James <br />P.usent - t�one <br />Jr...Councilmen Robert Woodburn, <br />Wiagert, Ward Hanson, <br />Also Pres�ent - Attorney James Lynden, Treasurer UonaBd Lam�+, <br />Pianr:er Orlyn Miller, Gierk Admtnistrator Chariotte <br />tAcNiesh, Uaputy Clerk Uorothy Zehm. <br />� Approval of I�inutes <br />��'ingert moved, sacor,ded by Crichton, that the fdinutes of 4he <br />Rogular Councll Fleehing of September 24th be approved as amended. <br />hlotion carried unanlmously. <br />E3usiness from thcr Floor <br />ldone . <br />Praposed Zondng (rdinance Review <br />Counci! was referred to tfie Proposed Zoning Ordinance tiast con- <br />siJered by Council on February 28, 9977) and.to respanses thereto <br />f^om Tom Muicahy tletter ot 9/ZII/79 re varia�ces, pages 4-11 and <br />4-12)o Pflenhe�' Oriyn P7liler (memo of 10-I-79 and recommendations <br />regarding earth shettereC structures) and Zani�g Administratar <br />Uarothy Zehm (mema cf 9/27/79). <br />t4+�icahy Letter of 9l28/79: <br />AFter discussion reSstj�ve to Mulcahy's co�cerns re variance pro- <br />c�dures, Counci I. coixcurred i-hat a"check 1 ist" be provided to <br />the applicant outifn',ng,the documentation required and an'explana- <br />t.on of the proc�dure tor review of the Apptication. CouneFl <br />concurred that f-lannin+a and Engineering reports are rtot confi- <br />dentia! and sl-ould be rr,ade available to the Applic»nt. <br />Council con�:urred with �'ulcahy�s suggestion that a definitior. <br />be includeJ of "Piannfng Commisston"; requosted Lynden to re- <br />�ord definitton #28 "Com,nission" (p. !-6) refertring fio astablish- <br />m�nt ot tha ?Ianning Com�nission by City Code; concurred that (t <br />Es no# necessary #o defina "Planner". <br />(Ce._ies of Lliller and_Zehm comments to 6e given to i•1ulcahy) <br />t'�� I ler 1�9emo of 10-I-79: <br />i. Yariances on subst�ndard lots - In discussion, it was sugges- <br />ted that sideyard setbac s, on dots 85' wide or less, be <br />reduced to an aggregate of.l5' (instead of 25') with a 5� <br />minimum (instead of 10') <br />p. 2-5 htinimum Distrlct Requtrements Chart was changed <br />as folloas: <br />6. Sideyard, l�terior <br />�� Princlp:e - delei-e (Aggregate min. 25')* <br />Accessory " " � " �� <br />Change 10 to'5 fn R-2, R-3 and f2-4 <br />After * Aggregate (�linimum 25�, add "in it-i; <br />Aggregqts Ntinfmum,l5' in R-Z, R-3 nnd R-�{ Distrlcts°.. <br />2< Provision for reviex and a roval of commarcist and lndustri <br />si e mo ficat ons - etermine tha t y o e requ res a <br />Building Permffi.for driveMays, sidewalks and parking lats; <br />fherefore provides for review by Planning Commissioh and <br />Councii, Miller was requested to suggest aording to provide <br />for rev€ew and approval ot other commercial and (ndustrial <br />site moditicafiions (lighting etc,) not covered by Ctty Code. <br />_�.. <br />