Laserfiche WebLink
, <br />Minutes of Regular Council Meeting <br />Page Four <br />of the Amended Special Use Permit wfth the <br />the Planning Commission m(nutes of 9/2/79, <br />July 9, 1479 <br />contfngencles 1(sted in <br />Bn discussion, Council concurred that approval of the we(r systam <br />and drainage storage area by ths City Engineer, and landscape,plan <br />approvai by the City Planner ts sufflcien#; expressed concern tl�at <br />the �orth site eroston probLem be fierminated and that the wate� be <br />restralned naw. <br />. <br />. <br />Mark Stevens expiained that placement of hay bales xlll not atfect <br />the eroston; have ab.out 20,000 yards of fiil stockpiled at north <br />stde af parking lot area whicb wili 6e used to•Dack-flll ti�e Phase . <br />I11 bu(Idtng; noted that water comes across the area from ths tennis <br />club at the northeast corner; propose to remove the dirt stockpile <br />by September or October, but tf repairs can�t be completed this tait, <br />they w(Ii dyke with hay bales to heip tt surv(ve the sprirtg roins <br />and then dredge the pond. <br />Council reviewed the Iandscape pian present�d at tonight'� meeting <br />(da?ed recefved 7/g/7g).and referred plan to Plaoner Miller tor <br />appraval and determination of bond. <br />Exterfor iighting was dtscribed as the same type used In the other <br />portions ot the sPte. <br />Wingert moved, ssconded by Woodburn, that Council approve an Ameaded <br />Speciai Use Permit for Pt�ase iil Cardtac Pacemakers, Inc. corts#ructton <br />>�s documented on pl.ans dated 6/22/79 (received 6/28/79? wlth the <br />following conditivns: <br />2. <br />3. <br />Controt of,Qroston at #he nvrth portton of the site be <br />provided durfng constructton, and presertt eros9on be <br />dredged and area restored subsequent to constructEon <br />of the parktng tot. <br />Slopes be returned to 3 to I prior to landscaptng. <br />Revlew of landscape plan by Ctty Planner for conformance <br />to required sc.reening end determinatFon of performance <br />bond. <br />4. Maxlmum bui'Iding height to be at 1018 elevation, tn�°lud- <br />(ng "1eChamical penthouse. <br />Motivn carrted unan'imously. <br />��� ^�• �y-� �suiidin P�rmit - 72 Un(t A ar#ment Hunters Park <br />Miller referred Council to a�ended <br />Park apartment comp�ex, which f�ei(eytEnterpr(ges 72 �Oit'Hunferg . <br />has peesented as the best solutton to the concerns $1Kji��S5�4 re pre- <br />vious pla�, proposals. Mtller noted that fihe buildings have been <br />re-orienfed on the site in order to give all units 4n east or west <br />exposure; 72 underg�ound parking spaces, as well as d6 exterior park- <br />Ong spaces, have been provided; grad3ng plan has been prepared urtder ' <br />City Enyineer�s requtrements to provFde adequate dralnage; access <br />road Aas been off-set l5 from north property line to provide for ' <br />pedestrtan pathxay, <br />Mtller noted that the landscape plan Is preliminary; degree of mai.n- <br />tenance of pond area has not been determtned; developer praposes <br />pond area to be left natural, which he •feeis woutd be desirable tf <br />it can be accompilshed, but he would not agree with an empty lot effect. <br />f'F was noted thet it may bo desirable to provide a deeper pond with <br />I�sss width Pn order to better retain its quality, <br />-4- <br />