CC 06-25-1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� � Minutes oi Regular Council Meeting Pa ge Fo u r June 25, I974 Mr. Ruppel said the 4' variance erould oot preaent a problem. Winger? moved, seconded by Hanson, that CouncTl approve a 4' sTdeyard vartance for a garage at 191i Gienpaul Avenue (6' irom.side praperty ITne). Motion carried unanimously. (It ras noted thaf the 4' variance is no? changing the existing vartance; other garages in i�he area have similar setbacks). Case No. 79-10 Lot 5 lit - 6erald Laroche Wtngert re erred Council to Plann�r s Report (6/14/79), Planning Commission Minutes of 6/19/79 and to tAe Survey deptctin� the lot split Qropt�sed. Noted #hat resultant lots wlll be conforming, creating no variences to sideyerd far the extsi'ing hame. After discusslon re n�ed for excavation and fill, and passible restricted house construction on the newly created lot, Wingart moved, seconded by Moodburn, that Counc9l approve the �ot spltt as (ndlcated on the survey (Rev. 5/4/761. Motion carrted unantmously. il � MingerT referred Courscil to plans submitted for a 37,420 sq. ft. aAditton to the south side of`Easts�de Beverage's officelw.arehouse buildingta# 1260 Grey Fox Road. In review of the Planner'g Repo�t (6/14/79) and Ptann7ng Commissio� recommendationa (Minu4es of 6/l9/79). Ningart notad that the area ;roverage overage of .3� (about 750�) Ts consJdered to De insigniticant, mee`ting the intent of the ord.:fnane+g; buildtog hei ht is 24'; total si'ta cacverags tbuilding, drives anil p�rking) is 71$ (75� permif#ed?; pian provi+das tor 112 parktng spaces (II0 are requfred.) Wipg�rt noted thaT the Planning Commtsston rocommends Pl�nning Commfsst:an and Coan�cT! app`rova) � of'the landscape plan prior to gra�ttng.occupanc� of fihe buildtng additioq. Wingert swved, seconded byHanson, that Council approve the i:ssuanca of a Buiid(og Permit;'for Eastside Beverage as per:plans, deted Ma.y, l, 1979 (receTved 5/18/,79.>, It�ndscape plan re�ieN A.y.:Planning Commf�srcion and su6sequenfi Counc3l l8ndscape approval, prior fio building oceupancy. In dTscussTon, Cr(chton expressed concern re clty granting a butidd`ng permit for a building addi-tEon which add5 to the ctty's draina�+e s�rsiem, xhen the deVeioper obJec?s fo paying his share of required de,dicat;ion for parks and storm water drainage. Rlck HOBlenkamp, representing EastsEde Bev�rage,,-explained that EasfisiGe Beverage has complled wTth the parks and storm water dedtcatTon r'equtre- ment oP the Subdiv(s�on OrAlnance; tee has been patd, developer is Gon- testing the percentage required for devefopment of this site, whic}i':is not a subdivisi�n. H�+Iie.nkamp said he would ltke Council to resolve the landscaping at ton(ght's meeting; Pl,anner has recommended°`thsf over- si�ory firses be planted at #he rear ot.the proposed addition; dsveloper is emenabfe fio planttng 6- S trees as�:suggested; noted �hat the raEl space Iimits the amount of planting that can be p:laced aiong the sou#h portion ot the site; suggested 6-8 �reen ash at the discretion of the City Piann�r; noted that all oi the Ist phase landscaping has bean completed. Bn disc�assion, the need for a detailed landscape plan was deemed necassary tn order to determtne the amount of the bond and #o Tnsure ptanting of the shze and varEeties approved. Mo#ion carried tWtngert, Hanson, Crepeau,�Nloodburn voting in tavor of the Motton; Crlchton voting in oppostttonY.