CC 11-13-1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minufes of Regular CouncFl Meefiinq page th ree NoV�mb�e 13s 1978 Nanson, thafi Councii deny the @ot spGE't as presented. After fur- ther discussion, fn wh,lch it was reparted that Mr. Laudan had indicated h9 woald be presenfi at tonight's meeting, Wood6urn moved to table the motlon until later in th� meeting. Moi�ion to �'ab4e carried unanimousB��. nfter a!1 other CounciV Agenda items ware considered, and tt bacama evid�n� that the apptic�nt �ouid not appear at the meeting, Nanson moved 4o recansider ihe original motion to deny the lot sp01t. Motton was seconded by Woodburn, carrted unanimously. The original mofio� denying the !ot spidt carried unanimously. � Case No. 78-34 Mtnor 8ubdivistan - 9n'hernationai Paper ComoartY MilVer revieweG his report of 10-30-78, and raferred Council fio the a'�tached sketches d�pict�ng the lot spiit proposed, andar�a p9afi and topographq. Mi.l@er e�eported that the Planning Commissian recommends Council approv�9 04 the proposed 9ot split co�t3ngent upon appravaB by the Fire Chie4. in dtscuSslon, it Was Counci6's co�sensus.fihat the PVanaing Com- mi5sion's fire concerns can ba more appropPiately resoBved at` bul9ding permif time on ParceG A. It w�s noted that there are numerous hydrants on the Internatfanal Papar Company s6te tParcel B). Hanson moved, seconded by Woodburn, t6at Council approve the lot spBft as proposed. Mo-Yion carried unan8mously. B Us� €'ermit to Ren r�ptiEif � r�'}ySFJyid6�lf7❑ �yOli1@S � � � . . � MiBaer ref�rred Counel! to his report of 10-27-78 and to fhe Pian- ning Commission's a�ocommendations (minutes of II�I-78); ex�lained tha� irhe applJcant is proposbng to deve9op the si�e in phases - the infttaB phase consists of renovation of th� existing scfiooB . butlding intarior ir�to 99 apartments for the �ldar6y, and a com- pYeteBy r�mada9ed l�uiBdtnq exterior; the site !s proposed to ramain en its axis�Fing conditfon exc�pf tor $he construcfiion of an eotrance driv2 for drap-o4f of resid�nts at ths froni', and minor modfficatio� af �he D3tumfnlous parking and serviee area. MtVter repor�t�d �hafi Yhe Plann(ng Commtssion recommends ?fiat an Inferim Specia! Us� P�rmtt be approved �Po address the building renovation on9y at this tfine; occupancy permdi� be withheld unti9 approvaB of an overa08 stte and landsca�e plan o4 the combined s14es. • � Reverend Hagstrom r�gerred Council to p8a�s prepared by Architect Robert Ack�rmann (bu'slding eGevafdons, fBoor pians and �irst Phase sit� p9a��; r�ported fihat, s3nce the P6anning Commission Meefiing _ of Novemb�r 6sf, an amended slte p-0an 4or the First Phase deve0op- msnt was peepared by Me�, Re�d, whlch altev?ates some of the con- cerns express�d by the P@anning Commis�ion. Mr. Reed (Par�c Nurs�ry? presa�ted tho asn�nded sl'�e p9sn proposa9 fdafied !B-BO-78) for 7he FB�st Phes� (Sutton PBace? deveBopment of a partion of fh� school site; roi-ed that plans for developing the ramadnder of �the s4�e �ro not y�i- camplefie. Bn review of the emendad p�an, R�ea sioted thaf the driv�way access from Laka Johanna BBvd, has b�en deB��ted and the two major e�frances have been changed tc the aast sid� ai` 4he building wlth access to a cu7-d�- sac"drfvsx�ay on the east sdde of fhe buiBdfng from County Roac� D. Ra�d noted that Yhe exist[ng 5'ituminous parktng i�t (east of th� butiding) vri8� be ra�maved €�nd e new bitum3nous parking Bot con- strucfed <°or 95 cars alarsg �he Ccrunty Road D sfde of the site; exist?ng front entr3nc� and s•Pairway on the aest stde of the build- ing wi�ll be retalnmd (entsanca wiE! be ufi9ized for fire exi� onBy3. tle� discuss6on, ii� �a5 noted �hat 'Phe bcal9dtog wi I I be highty sacured and wi&9 have a resdd�nt custos9tan; an identtftcation stgn is proposed in fhe corner of the site 4Gounty Road D and Lake e3_