CC 02-06-1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

! MR. POPOVICH: "As I remember the feasibility report, the cost we have given you does not include anything for the acqui- sition of the property, does it, Don?" MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN; "No." MR. POPOViCH: "So that would be left to what other nec}ot3ations - bther considerations may be that are involved," C UNCI CRICHTON; "it ass s a trade because if we don't the other section � Connelly, then there is not enouqh parking space for the building." MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: "That's the assumption i was going on - that they were swapping land." MR. POPOVICH: But there's no assumpt3on that there would be any other cost added to this." • MR. FLAHERTY: "The cost £actor involved in that is a cost factor (inaudible) so what we're trying to do is achieve the smallest cost possible for the whole development. That's why i thought maybe a21 of the factors that went zn to deveZop • miqht be subject to discussion rather than have the whole thing done and then at some future time have a determination made as to the method upon which construction would be assessed." � � MR. POBOVICH: "I think what the Council has to ascertain - becanse this is a feasibility hearinq and the assessment hearinq doea come later - but based on the feasibility report, is he opposed to the improvement going ahead assuming the warst, be- cause if it turned out to be the worst, then abvioualy the Council ought to know that and you would consider whether you'd order the i.mprovement. As to whether there's any portion you could work out depending on what other considerations come into play - the openinq of bids - the cost of the project - some of these other things - then obviously that, you can take into consideration when the fina2 assessmenEs are made prior to the assessment hearing and the adoption of the assessment roll, but Mr. Flaherty, you don't convey to the Council that the project is not feasible." 5