2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 2, 2005 2 1. Thc applicant shall continue to abide by thc conditions of approval listed in Special . Use Pennit #70-36 except feJr the site plan amendment discussed. 2. No construction shall occur on all or part of Lots 1, 2, or 3, Block 3, Lake Josephine Villas prior to those properties being platted into one rcsidential lot which meets the minimum requirements for the R-2: Single and Two Family Residential Zoning District. 3. If membcrship or f,TUest attendance increases to a point where 12 parking spaces are utilizcd on a recun-ing basis, then thc Oddfellow's Lodge would be required to construct the matching parking area shown as "additional space for parking if ever needed" on the sitc plan and included in City Planning File #05-04. 4. The proposed new parking area and any future parking, as discussed in Condition #3, shall be gradcd to drain toward the northeast comer of the new parking area. The grading and drainage shall take spccial eare to avoid any adverse drainage effects on Lots I, 2, or 3, Slack 3, Lake Josephine Villas. 5. Screening of at least 60% opacity shall be providcd along the north, east, and south sides of the new parking lot as proposcd on the site plans on file in City planning tile #05-04. Screening may be accomplished by a 3-foot high privacy style fencc or coniferous shrubs to a minimum height of 3 feet. Screening shall require the approval of the City Planner prior to the issuance of any Building or Zoning Permits. Commi'ssioner Zimmerman inquired about the park dedication requirement. Mr. Hellegers replied the City Attomey had indicated park dedication would not be something that would be collected becausc the properties would be consolidated and this . was not a matter of a subdivision. Commissioner Zimmerman asked if the intent was to subdividc the lot and sell the lots off to development. Mr. Hellcgers rcplied what applicant proposcd was to put this into onclot. Commissioncr Zimmemlan believcd if the end rcsult was to sell of the property for development, then they should collcct park dedication fees. Mr. Clark replied they would have the City Attol1ley revicw this again and put his opinion in writing. Commissioncr Modcsettc noted the two lots across thc street appcared indcpcndent and other lots had bcen consolidatcd to makc nice sizc lots. Mr. Hcllegcrs replied thc two lots across the street werc built without platting. He notcd applicant was proposing to cut the thrcc lots off and sell them as one parcel. Commissioncr Larson askcd if thc City held an easemcnt along the street. Mr. Hellegcrs replied they did. Chair Sand notcd in conncction with any motion thcy would need to make the special finding. . Chair Sand asked if the application included platting of thc three lots into one lot. Mr. Hellegers replied this particular application did not.