Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10,2006 3 <br />. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS I <br /> I <br /> A. Royal Oaks - Vacatin2: of a 20 foot wide Pedestrian Walkway Easement at the Old <br /> City Hall Site I <br /> I <br /> Mr. Lehnhoff stated Royal Oaks Realty was requesting the vacation of the Pedestrian Walkway <br /> Easement. The easement was lapproximately 20 feet wide by 280 feet long and was located on <br /> the former Arden Hills City Hall/Public Works property at 1440-1450 West Highway 96. <br /> I <br /> Mr. Lehnhoff also stated that he recommends that condition one be removed from the staff <br /> recommendation. Since the easement would need to be vacated for anyone that purchased this <br /> propel1y, the vacation should not be contingent upon conveying the trail along the westem side of <br /> the property to the City. He stated the City would require anyone purchasing the propeliy to <br /> I <br /> convey the trail to the City. Should Royal Oaks decide to not develop the property, the City <br /> would have to address this easetnent again in the future if the condition is kept. <br /> Councilmember Holden ask6d why we would want to vacate this easement without the <br /> condition. I <br /> Mr. Jerry Filla stated that thd City is the fee owner of the property, and the City Could place <br /> future easement on the property:. <br />. Mayor Aplikowski opened the1public hearing at 7:10 p.m. <br /> I <br /> There were no comments made. <br /> I <br /> Mayor Aplikowski closed the ~ublic hearing at 7: 11 p.m. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a <br /> motion to approve the Resolution 06-49 to vacate the 20 foot wide <br /> pedestriah walkway easement at 1440-1450 West Highway 96. The <br /> motion carried unanimously (3-0). <br /> 7. NEW BUSINESS <br /> I <br /> A. Plannin2: Case 06-028: Site Plan Review - Hien N2:o & Np.uvet Kv: 3433 Lake <br /> Johanna Boulevard I <br /> I <br /> Mr. Lehnhoff stated the Plmming Commission reviewed the re-Iandscaping plan and <br /> unanimously voted to table the application at their October 4, 2006 meeting. While the <br /> landscaping plan was moving in the right direction, the Commission tabled the application in <br /> order to obtain additional infotmation regarding the shoreland restoration, the stonnwater pipe <br /> and easement along the northem edge of the property, clarifying the duration of the financial <br />. surety, and the trees near the westem edge of the property. If the applicant can submit revised <br /> plans in time for the next PlanAing Commission meeting, the site plan review would appear on <br /> I <br />