My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-08-07 Full Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
01-08-07-R
>
01-08-07 Full Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2007 4:46:50 PM
Creation date
2/16/2007 10:01:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
01/08/07 Agenda Packet
General - Type
Agenda Packet
Date
1/8/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> PROPOSED UNIT COSTS AND ASSESSMENTS . <br /> The following narrative provides information and definitions of the various types of properties <br /> affected by the proposed improvements, as stated in the Assessment Policy revised and adopted by <br /> the City Council in 2004. <br /> The assessment policy states that the assessment is based on the total project cost, or estimated <br /> construction cost and associated overhead costs. City Council may choose to base the assessment on <br /> contract priees~ deviation from the assessment policy is allowed as deemed appropriate. Estimated <br /> construction costs are estimates only; we can only anticipate factors affecting construction costs, but <br /> have no control over them. If the assessment is based on estimated construction costs, there is a <br /> possibility of over-assessing residents if the actual bids come in low. If bids come in higher than <br /> estimated, this would result in the City paying for a larger portion of the project. Staff recommends <br /> that costs for project financing should be based upon actual, competitive bid prices with reasonable <br /> contingencies. The proposed schedule of the project would allow for the assessment hearing to take <br /> place prior to construction if contract prices are used. <br /> Residential properties <br /> The policy states that "all residentially zoned properties with frontage abutting a strcet that is <br /> overlaid with bituminous shall be assessed on a per unit basis at the residential equivalent assessment <br /> rate." The residential equivalent assessment rate shall be based on 50% of the cost of the bituminous <br /> overlay, plus associated overhead costs. <br /> A lot unit is defined in the assessment policy as a platted single-family residential lot or equivalent. . <br /> which cannot be further subdivided for R-l and R-2 residential use according to the current City <br /> Code. <br /> Comer lots are assessed on the street used for the mailing address; this has been factored into the <br /> proposed preliminary assessment roll. <br /> Commercial properties <br /> The assessment policy states that commercial/industrial properties are to be assesscd a commercial <br /> equivalent as.sessment based on 70% of the cost of the bituminous overlay, plus associated overhead <br /> costs. <br /> Tax-exempt properties <br /> The assessment policy states that tax-exempt properties are to be assessed based on 100% of thc <br /> bituminous overlay, plus associated overhcad costs. The tax-exempt equivalent assessment rate shall <br /> be set by the City Council. For the purposes of detemlining this rate, staff has converted tax-exempt <br /> equivalent units (TED) to residential equivalent units (RED) as described below. <br /> The following table provides the proposed number and type of units to be included in the preliminary <br /> assessment roll. A narrative explanation follows for streets with atypical proposed assessments. <br /> . <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.