My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-13-2006
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCP 11-13-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:29:11 PM
Creation date
2/16/2007 10:05:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ~ . <br /> ~~HILLS <br /> MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: November 6, 2006 Agenda Item 7.E <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: James Lehnhoff: City PlannerV <br /> ..- <br />SUBJECT: Evaluation Criteria for Planning Case Consent Calendar <br />Back2round <br />At the September 18, 2006, City Council work session, the Council requested that Staff prepare a set <br />of evaluation criteria for detemlining if a planning case can be placed on the City Council"s consent <br />calendar. Since many planning cases are not controversial and have a unanimous recommendation <br />from the Planning Commission, this step would increase the efliciency of reviewing certain non- <br />controversial planning cases at City Council meetings. . <br />Discussion <br />To determine if a planning case can be placed on the City Council"s consent calendar, the following <br />evaluation criteria are proposed: <br />. The Planning Commission unanimously approved or denied the planning case; <br />. The City Council liaison recommends placing the planning case on the consent calendar; <br />. There was an opportunity for the public to comment on the planning case at a public meeting <br /> prior to the City Council voting on the planning case; <br />. There was minimal public input or disagreement regarding the planning case at the Planning <br /> Commission meeting; <br />A planning case would need to meet all of the above criteria to be placed on the City Council"s <br />consent calendar. As with any consent calendar item, any member of the City Council may remove a <br />planning case from the consent calendar for additional discussion. <br />The City Attorney was consulted about this proposal, and he stated that there are not any legal issues <br />with placing planning cases on the consent calendar. However, he did note that it was important to <br />include the basis for the approval or denial in the written motion language that is adopted in the <br />consent calendar. For planning cases placed on the consent calendar, Staff will include the required <br />findings in the motion language. <br />Recommendation <br />Staff recommends adopting the evaluation criteria for placing planning cases on the consent calendar. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.