Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> ~ <br />. ~~!fILLS <br /> MEJ\'IO RAN [) U [\'1 <br /> ----. <br /> DATE: November 20, 2006 CC Agenda Item 7.B <br /> TO: Mayor & City Council <br /> FROM: James LdmhofT, City Plalllleff <br /> StlB.JECT: PC #: 06-028 <br /> Bien Ngo & Nguyet Ky <br /> 3433 Lake Johanna Blvd <br /> Landscape Site Plan Review <br /> MO' .~... <br /> J{('lI uested Action <br /> ((msider a motion to approve Planning Case 06-028, Site Plan Review for Hien Ngo & Nguyct <br /> Ky :It 3433 Lake Johanna Blvd. subject to ] 1 conditions. <br />. Back2round <br /> At the end orJuly 200(), 3433 Lake Johanna Blvd was clear-cut, which was in violation of the <br /> City's Shorcland Ordinance, The property has frontage on Lake Johanna Blvd and Fairview <br /> A venue on the westell1 side of Lake Johanna, While it is a regrettable situation, the property <br /> owner has been very cooperative \vith the City, The City has not dealt with a similar violation in <br /> recent memory and, unfortunately, there was not a defined process for handling such a violation. <br /> Staff has been working to formulate a process that would produce the most positive outcome for <br /> the City and the neighborhood and resolve this particular violation, <br /> Due to the extent oi'the vegetation removal, it was clear that the re-Iandscaping plan needed to <br /> he extensive and subject to City review and approval. The most compatible and in-place process <br /> for reviewing the landscaping plan \vas the City's site plan review process, Generally, a <br /> residential property is not subject to a landscaping revie\v, The property owner readily <br /> volunteered to go through the site plan review process, agreed to cont<mn to the conditions of the <br /> site plan review, submitted the required documentation, paid the $400 site plan review fce, and <br /> has agreed to submit a financial surety to ensure that the landscaping is installed as approved by <br /> the City. <br /> The proposed landscaping plan was review'ed by the Planning Commission at their October 4. <br /> 2006, meeting, The application was tabled at that time to allow the property O\Vner to address a <br /> few eoncems and to submit a revised plan. The revised plan was reviewed at the November I, <br />. : ',\iell'll-il/.'III,' 'lInlel/hill" J'llIl/l/il/g'-!'lwlIling (i/ses::!OO(,:06-(l:!S "\l;O Silt' 1'1(111 R,'\'il,lt, (/'/c'XO/..Vr;',i' /113(1(,.. (,'C R"!,IIr/ - '\~II sill' !,Ill/u/lle <br /> PagelofS <br />