Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Request for Variance from Setback Requirements for <br />Property 1486 Arden Oaks Drive, Arden Hills, MN <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />(. <br /> <br />For my property on 1486 Arden Oaks Drive, Arden Hills, MN, I hereby apply for a <br />variance that would allow me to build a garage on the property that is set back 20'. This <br />variance would allow me to build a garage in front of the existing garage. The plan is to dig out <br />the driveway so that the new driveway and the new garage would be only about one or two feet <br />above street level. The roof of the new garage would be flat and only two to three feet higher <br />than the existing "landing" in front of the garage, thereby blending in with the existing property <br />and its front yard and reducing any potential impact on the overall "look" of the individual <br />property and the street in its entirety. According to the contractor I intend to work with, a new <br />garage should be put in front of the existing one, not underneath the existing one, because the <br />back wall of the existing garage is at the same time the outside wall of the basement, first and <br />second floor of the house - the closer the back wall of a lower level garage is to this existing <br />outside wall, the more the structural integrity of the entire house is endangered. Putting a new <br />garage 20' in front ofthe existing garage would reduce potential problems for the building <br />structure itself to a minimum and would still leave a driveway that would be long enough for <br />visitors to park in front of the new garage instead of on the street. <br /> <br /> <br />Reasons underlving my request for a variance (numbers in brackets refer to the hardship <br />criteria set forth in the Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance, Section VIII, 4, and Minn. Stat. 462.357 <br />Subd.6): <br /> <br />My current garage is built exactly on the setback line of 40'. The North-facing driveway <br />(including the city property bordering the street) is approximately 52' long. With the exception <br />of a small flat "landing" of a few feet immediately in front of the garage entrance, the entire <br />driveway has a steep incline of just over 8' (i.e. an incline of approximately 16%), which makes <br />a reasonable and safe use of the driveway at temperatures around 32 degrees and below <br />impossible [1, 2]. <br /> <br />I acquired the property in the summer of2003. In Fall of2003, in order to mitigate any <br />problems that the driveway posed for visitors to the house, I had a contractor build a concrete <br />staircase (with railing) from the street to a landing next to the garage, with a walkway to the <br />house, which has ensured a safe access to the house for pedestrians ever since. We inquired into <br />the possibility of installing a heated driveway, but had to realize that due to the slope of the <br />property, this would result in additional/new problems such as the build-up of ice dams at the <br />curb and in the street. Thus, after three (mostly mild) winters, we still have not been able to find <br />a satisfactory and safe solution for using the driveway itself: <br /> <br />We use a lot of salt, combined with traction grit, and clean the driveway even if less than <br />half an inch of snow has fallen. While cleaning the driveway, we have to wear shoes with metal <br />spikes to prevent us from falling and to give us the necessary traction on the driveway (once a <br />neighbor whose shoes did not have such spikes helped me clean the driveway; he was sliding up <br />and down the driveway to an extent that made him rather uncomfortable and probably regret his <br />