Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2007 PMP <br />5/24/2007 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />subsequent costs may change throughout the pre-design and final design process. As a result, <br />residents may feel misguided if estimated and actual rates differ. <br /> <br />Staff analvsis of financing options (3-6): <br />In an effort to alleviate the financial burden of the assessment, the City Council could choose <br />to make the following changes for this project: <br />a.) The length of the payment period could be extended to ten (10) years, as opposed to <br />the five (5) years as stated in the Assessment Policy. <br />b.) The Assessment Policy was adopted when interest rates were at an all time low. <br />The City's investments have about a 4.5% annualized rate of return. Council could adopt <br />an interest rate set at 2% above this rate, which would recover the costs of carrying the <br />debt and the administrative charges incurred from the county, auditors and staff time to <br />track <br />c.) The Assessment Policy states that the payments shall be equal principle payments. <br />This means the principal payment is the same every year (total assessment divided by <br />number of years in the payment period), but the interest payment the total interest on the <br />balance of the principle in a given year. The payments will decrease every year, as the <br />balance will become less, and interest to be paid will then be lower as well. Changing the <br />payment plan to equal annual installments, the payment would be equalized for the term <br />and more manageable for residents, as they could budget the same amount of money for a <br />payment each year. One thing to note is that with an equal annual installment over an <br />extended payment period, residents would pay more in interest than with equal principle <br />payments. <br />d.) The Assessment Policy does have an option for senior citizens, which was described <br />at the May 14,2007 City Council meeting. For this deferral, residents must be 65 years of <br />age or older and must establish economic hardship (an annual gross income of less than <br />50% of Ramsey County median household income, which is $45,722 based on the 2000 <br />census.) Applicants need to fill out a deferral form available at City Hall and provide <br />supporting tax documents for City approval. If approved, the assessments are deferred <br />with interest until the property is sold. This ensures that the city receives their money, but <br />also helps those on a fixed income while they are still in their home. <br /> <br />Staff recommendation: Approve modifications a), b) and c) as described above. Support <br />senior deferrals (d) to those who are eligible and request it. <br /> <br />7) Oral comment: 1556 Briarknoll Drive, Judy Ophaug <br />Ms. Ophaug asked whether historic information was available as to the amount of past <br />assessments for similar projects. She also noted the overhead included in the assessment rate <br />seemed high. <br /> <br />Staff analvsis: <br />The City of Arden Hills has not had a project in which a full depth pavement replacement <br />was completed as is being constructed on Briarlmoll Drive. The last mill and overlay project <br />completed by the City was in 2003; this project consisted of a six foot (6') edge mill and two- <br />