My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-29-07 Item 7C, Infiltraton and Inflow Study
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
05-29-07-R
>
05-29-07 Item 7C, Infiltraton and Inflow Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2007 4:43:06 PM
Creation date
5/25/2007 11:05:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
05-29-07 Item 7C, I&I Study
General - Type
Agenda Item
Category
I&I Study Contract with BRA, Inc.
Date
5/29/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1&1 <br />5/24/2007 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />surface water. In the sanitary sewer, III is a problem because it uses pipe and treatment capacity that <br />should be reserved for wastewater. In extreme cases, excessive III flows can cause sewer system <br />backups and bypassing at treatment plants. <br /> <br />The New MCES Plan: Historically, the MCES has charged communities for III based on the <br />volume of water that was metered in the system without consideration of peak flows. In the past few <br />years, MCES has been working with a task force to develop a new approach to reducing peak III <br />flows that have a significant impact on interceptor and treatment plant sizing. This new approach <br />will result in a surcharge for each community based on the peak flows in their collection system. The <br />MCES will review three years of flow data to develop an average flow. A peaking factor is then <br />applied to the average data to establish an "allowable peak flow rate." This calculated allowable <br />peak is then compared to actual measured peaks to identifY peaks that exceed the allowable. This <br />difference is considered "excessive flow," and is typically related to infiltration and/or inflow. The <br />calculated allowable flow is established as the goal for the City to meet to avoid surcharges. <br /> <br />In 2003 the MCES appointed a task force oflocal government representatives to examine the <br />problem of III and propose strategies to solve it. In 2006, the MCES adopted a surcharge program to <br />reduce III based on the recommendations and input from the local community representatives on the <br />task force. Strategies include: <br /> <br />. Setting III goals for all communities served by the metropolitan disposal system, and requiring <br />communities to reduce their III to meet design flow standards by 2012. <br /> <br />. Requiring all communities to develop and implement an III reduction program and include it in <br />their local comprehensive plan. Communities currently within their III goals will need to <br />develop plans for maintaining acceptable levels as the local infrastructure ages. <br /> <br />. Starting in 2007, instituting a surcharge for maximum peak excessive III to provide funding for <br />city III reduction efforts. Communities will have the right to appeal the surcharges, and deferrals <br />may be requested for any surcharge amount more than 25 percent of the municipal wastewater <br />charge imposed by the MCES. <br /> <br />. Starting in 2013, instituting a "demand charge" for communities that still do not meet their III <br />reduction goals, funds the MCES would employ to address the problem. <br /> <br />. Potentially limiting increased wastewater service to communities with ongoing, excessive 1/1. <br /> <br />The Met Council will work collaboratively with communities to reduce III in the wastewater system. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.