Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Pavement Management Program (PMP) <br />At the May Work Session, staff presented preliminary results from GoodPointe <br />Technology in relation to the City's pavement management and maintenance. Council <br />indicated that of the scenarios presented, scenario 3, based on the desire to increase the <br />overall PCI (Pavement Condition Index) rating to 75, was most desirable. Staff has <br />proceeded to determine PMP projects for the next five years that incorporates <br />GoodPointe's recommendations. Attached is a map with proposed improvements over <br />the next five years. <br /> <br /> <br />CIP Discussion <br />]11812007 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />2007-201 I Proiects <br /> <br />Staff considered GoodPointe's suggestions for improvements in conjunction with the <br />following factors: whether the street has concrete curb and gutter, and the needs for <br />watermain, sanitary sewer or storm sewer improvements. Staff also visually inspected the <br />streets to confirm or revise the recommended maintenance strategy. Many of the streets <br />that were listed as mill and overlay candidates were streets that do not have curb and <br />gutter, are at least 30 years old and likely have thin layers of bituminous with an <br />insufficient base. If these streets were milled, it is likely that the milling procedure would <br />result in the removal of the asphalt in its entirety, exposing the insufficient subgrade, <br />requiring the scope of the project to change from a mill and overlay to a complete <br />reconstruct. These streets often were also found to have little to no storm sewer and poor <br />drainage due to the lack of curb and gutter. While staff felt that several of these streets <br />were not candidates for mill and overlay, the pavement condition was found to be <br />suitable for a seaIcoat. SeaIcoating these streets would extend the life of the pavement <br />long enough so that we could address streets that are candidates for mill and overlays and <br />do have curb and gutter and a sufficient subgrade. As with all sealcoats, some minor <br />maintenance would be required, such as crack sealing, patching, and leveling. <br /> <br />Historically, streets have been sealcoated one to two years after reconstruction or mill and <br />overlay. GoodPointe's analysis did not use this philosophy; recommendations for <br />sealcoating occurred when the PCI of a street indicated the need for minor maintenance. <br />Staff utilized this information, as well as visual inspections, to determine which streets <br />were good candidates for seaIcoats. <br /> <br />During the visual inspection of the streets, staff found that some streets with concrete <br />curb and gutter that were listed as mill and overlay candidates had more distresses than <br />typically recommended for a mill and overlay. The cracks and distresses present would <br />reflect through the overlay within a few years after paving. Soil borings can be taken to <br />determine the presence of a sufficient base. If one exists, these streets are good candidates <br />for full pavement replacement. This is a procedure where the base and curb and gutter <br />remain in place, and only the existing pavement is removed and replaced. Streets <br />recommended for this type of improvement are shown as mill and overlay streets on the <br />attached map. <br />