Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION -JUNE 6, 2007 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Is- <br />LL, <br /><r <br />~ <br />o <br /> <br />new road itself be a 90 degree right hand comer rather than the curve as drawn in the <br />plan? A right hand comer would make people slow down and pay more attention as they <br />turn the comer. A wide curve as drawn allows cars to dash through at a faster speed. <br />Also, with the long straight roadway from Katie Circle to the new curve, cars have a long <br />stretch to accelerate. Just a thought! Thank you for your consideration!" <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked if there were any conditions attached to the 1983 <br />variance that were not covered in the staff report. Mr. Lehnhoff responded there was not. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson asked if any of the new lots adjacent to the existing lots would be <br />non-conforming. Mr. Lehnhoffresponded there would be none. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked if porches would necessitate an additional 10-foot <br />encroachment into the front yard setback. Mr. Lehnhoff responded new construction <br />would need to respect all setbacks, but a front porch could be as close as 30 feet under the <br />provisions ofthe Zoning Code. <br /> <br />Chair Sand noted his property backed up to Ha2elnut Park and he was familiar with this <br />property. He indicated he was aware of some fill material that had been there for years <br />on what will be Block 2, Lot 2. He asked if this fill would be removed. Mr. Lehnhoff <br />responded he believed the developer would need to remove it, but he was not aware of <br />that material. <br /> <br />Chair Sand asked if the grading plan submitted would there be much hauling off or <br />bringing in offill materials. Mr. Lehnhoff responded the City Engineer did not make any <br />comments on this, but the applicant was in attendance tonight and would have that <br />information. <br /> <br />Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m. and invited anyone for or against the <br />Planning Case to come forward. <br /> <br />Jeff Hermes, 3296 Katie Court, stated he liked that this was going to be single-family <br />residential, even though it was zoned for R-3. He stated he did not want to see a bunch of <br />town homes. He asked if they could consider making the road more of a square comer <br />rather than a curve. <br /> <br />Tony Evans, 3280 Katie Court, stated he was neither for nor against this development and <br />he liked that they were putting in single-family homes in this development. He expressed <br />concern about the speed on Katie Lane. He encouraged some kind of speed control on <br />Katie Lane. With respect to the pond, he noted there was snow from the apartments <br />across Cleveland being pushed into the pond. He asked if this would continue and how <br />would it affect the drainage if it was. Chair Sand stated that particular issue should be <br />brought up with Ramsey County as Cleveland was a County Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff noted that if a private contractor from the apartments is pushing snow onto <br />the private land, that should not be occurring. <br />