My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-16-07-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
04-16-07-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2007 9:05:00 AM
Creation date
6/26/2007 9:04:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
04-16-07 City Council Worksession Minute
General - Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
4/16/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION - APRIL 16, 2007 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Councihnember Grant asked if Highway 10 is considered part of the off ramp and if so, is it part <br />ofthe Federal system. <br /> <br />Mr. Jim Tolaas, Ramsey County, stated Highway 10 is part of the federal transportation system. <br /> <br />A discussion on Highway 10 ensued. <br /> <br />Councihnember Grant asked if the county had enough money to do the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolaas replied the County has funding to do the work related to CSAH 96. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolaas explained how federal money can be used for City and County road projects. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead commented that the schedule is complicated. He discussed the timeline to <br />complete the County Road H, Highway 10, and CSAH 96. <br /> <br />A discussion ensued on the timeline and funding process. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated the issue of the timeline is getting onto the Governors bonding bill for <br />the Highway 10, and CSAH 96 project. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wolfe stated the application deadline for the Governor's bonding bill is May <br />2007. <br /> <br />A discussion on 35W, 694 and Highway 10 ensued. <br /> <br />Ms. Gen McJilton, RRLDlRyan, stated that the resolution formalizing a design concept for <br />County Road H, Highway 10, and CSAH 96 would begin the project in fall of 2008 and conclude <br />the fall of 2009. She commented they are looking for available funding at the Federal, State, or <br />County level and need a resolution that enables them to be reimbursed if the City is able to <br />acquire additional funding from the federal or state govemment. <br /> <br />A discussion on the County Road H, Highway 10, and CSAH 96 projects ensued. <br /> <br />2. Next Steps <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead recommended breaking the discussion into the two intersections. <br /> <br />A discussion on how the resolution should be worded ensued. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead commented the $20 million requested in the federal process is tied to a specific <br />project (County Road H). He stated the City must come up with a 20% match ofthe total cost of <br />the project; this is the 80/20 project match. He explained the concept of the 80/20 project match <br />and understanding the funding timelines. The match could come from the state, county, Met <br />Council, or other sources. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.