My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-16-07 EDC Meeting Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Economic Development Commission (EDC)
>
EDC Minutes
>
2007
>
05-16-07 EDC Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2007 9:09:10 AM
Creation date
6/26/2007 9:09:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
05-16-07 EDC Meeting Minutes
General - Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
5/16/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />~ILLS <br /> <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br />ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION <br />MAY 16, 2007; 7:30 AM <br />CITY HALL -- 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96 <br /> <br />Chair Kunkel called the meeting to order at 7 :31 a.m. <br /> <br />Attendees: Chair Bruce Kunkel, Nancy Kneeland, Dale Beane, Chris Ashbach, Rob Davidson, <br />Ray McGraw, Jim Paulet, Mayor Harpstead, Community Development Director Karen Barton. <br /> <br />Absent: Ed Werner. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES - APRIL 25.2007 <br />The minutes from the April 25 meeting were approved as corrected. <br /> <br />REVIEW OF EDC PLAN <br />Chair Kunkel explained that currently we have two versions of the EDC plan - one the Mayor <br />revised and the one developed by Desco - and asked the group how they wanted to proceed with <br />fmalize the EDC plan. <br /> <br />Jim asked if we accepting both versions of the document and editing them both. Chair Kunkel <br />said one ofthe ideas could be to work with both documents; or, if the group so chose, they could <br />accept or reject one of the versions and move forward with the accepted version. The Mayor <br />reminded the group that it is their objective to bring a document to a Council Worksession. <br /> <br />Ray expressed his concerns with the current EDC plan and that it didn't fit into the needs of the <br />City. He indicated the group did not have to go with all of Desco's recommendations. He also <br />expressed what he thought were the City's main three issues at hand: curb appeal, <br />redevelopment, and the location ofthe current City Hall. <br /> <br />Chair Kunkel acknowledged Ray's passion and concerns and expressed that he thought the <br />Mayor is trying to develop a plan to allow the City to move forward and gather momentum. <br /> <br />The Mayor asked if the three items Ray expressed concern about are in the Desco version of the <br />EDC plan. Ray acknowledged that they were in the Desco plan. <br /> <br />Nancy asked if she could make a motion to proceed on the Mayor's amended plan being we have <br />already progressed beyond the Desco plan already. She indicated it is her desire to work on one <br />plan. Dale Beane seconded the motion. <br /> <br />Chris said he thought there wasn't enough substantial difference between the Desco plan or the <br />Mayor's version to lose anything by working on one versus the other. <br /> <br />The Mayor indicated the timing of the plan is important due to the budget cycle. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.