Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BORING LOCATIONS AND ELEVATION <br /> <br />The number of borings, locations and pattern were determined by the Client and <br />Development Engineering. Insofar as possible, compromising as necessary due to factors such as <br />access conditions, terrain, obstacles, etc, borings were placed as directed in an attempt to obtain <br />. geotechnical data representative of the site. <br /> <br />FIELD INVESTIGATION <br /> <br /> <br />The borings were accomplished using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) method of <br />investigation using a Split-Barrel Sampler (SBS). <br /> <br />SOIL BORING RESULTS <br /> <br />Please refer to the individual boring logs for a detailed description of soils and moisture <br />conditions encountered. Attached to the soil boring logs is a key explaining terms and entries. The <br />depth of individual layers of soils may vary somewhat from those indicated on the logs due to <br />unsampled intervals between split-barrel sampler tests and, most importantly, the occurrence of <br />transition between soil layers. Also, soil profiles not in the vicini1y of the borings may vary_ Refusal <br />to auger advancement was not encountered at the boring locations, indicating lack of bedrock to <br />depths tested. <br /> <br />Please refer to the individual boring logs for a more detailed description of soils and moisture <br />conditions encountered. Penetration "N" values indicate the Glacial Till soils are Very Soft turning <br />to Medium then Stiff with depth. <br /> <br />Standing water was found in the boring 4.5 feet below existing ground grade which is near <br />the elevation surface water of the creek located on the property. Groundwater levels may occur and <br />vary according to various climatological and meteorological influences undetermined within the time <br />frame, scope and budget allowed in this investigation. Area development patterns can also influence <br />groundwater. Indicated results in the Soil Boring Logs are for time and conditions of testing only. <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon interpreted results of boring <br />logs, their relation to the plauned work, and other information. Because the borings represent a small <br />portion of the site iri reTation to the proposed area of work, ongoing review ofconslIuction should <br />be carried out. If excavations reveal subsurface soils of a different nature than those observed in the <br />boring, the Geotechnical Engineer should be contracted for possibly revised recommendations. <br /> <br />L General Site Suitabili1y <br /> <br />Based upon interpreted results of the borings, it appears that the site has some limitations <br />regarding suitability for construction. The presence of uncontrolled fill, organic sediments and a high <br />groundwater table and low N-values in the upper 20 feet. Ordinary cut and fill soil correction would <br />most likely be uneconomical due to the depth of excavation, oversizing and dewatering the high <br />groundwater table. <br /> <br />2 <br />