Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Meeting Minutes - TCAAP City CouncilPlanning Commission Worksession <br /> <br />2. View corridors should be considered for future expansion of roads into the existing <br />National Guard property if that ever becomes available for future development. <br />3. Some members of the Joint Committee agree with the members of the public who feel the <br />residential density included in the preliminary program is too high. <br />4. Committee members would like to see the financial numbers supporting the need for the <br />range of different land uses, particularly the residential numbers. <br />5. David McClung and Fran Holmes suggested the planning team illustrate a plan with half <br />the programmed residential units (1100 units rather than 2200 units). <br />6. Most members agree that a variety of housing types should be included in the <br />development at TCAAP, just not so dense. One member of the committee feels people <br />just don't want to live in higher density housing types such as condominiums or <br />apartments. <br />7. There was discussion about the aging population base and the desire for baby boomers to <br />down-size their homes, moving from single family homes to townhomes and <br />condominiums, which is consistent with the data provided by Betty HardIe in earlier <br />meetings with the committee. <br />8. Not all on the committee feel the density range is too high as proposed in the preliminary <br />development program. <br />9. The group reviewed current land use numbers (acres and percentage ofland use) in <br />Arden Hills and the impact of those numbers ifTCAAP is built out as proposed in the <br />preliminary program. (See attached). The current residential density in Arden Hills is 2 <br />dwelling units per acre. With the addition of the proposed TCAAP program, the city's <br />residential density would raise to 3 dwelling units per acre. <br />10. It was mentioned that the average range of residential units proposed in the preliminary <br />program is much less than the average range of residential units proposed in the Vision <br />Framework. Not all agreed that the Vision Framework numbers could be relied upon. <br />II. Stacie (Ehlers) mentioned to the group that once a preferred plan is more defined the <br />planning team and financial consultants can get a better idea of the project costs and <br />balance them with needed land use program and residential densities needed to make the <br />development financially feasible. The process will be an iterative one. <br />12. It was clear from the discussion that a worksession that focused on the financial <br />implications of the development is necessary. <br />13. Need to define different retail considerations for development at TCAAP. <br /> <br />V. Specific comments regarding Roads, Open Space and Land Uses represented on the 3 <br />Preliminary Plans: <br /> <br />Roads <br /> <br />I. Most (8 people) preferred the roads and open space represented on Concept A. <br />2. 3 members expressed a desire to eliminate the road connection through the wildlife <br />corridor. <br />3. Two members stated a desire for the road through the wildlife corridor to provide access <br />to the athletic fields. <br />4. One member suggested a desire for curvy roads to slow traffic. Another member <br />disagreed that curvy roads don't necessarily slow traffic (citing the speeding traffic <br />around Lake Josephine) <br />5. No long thoroughfares. <br />6. One preference for the road layout in Concept B. <br />7. Consider the use of a few cul-de-sacs to create neighborhoods in the single family areas. <br /> <br />4 <br />