My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-30-07 Item 4B, Planning Case 07-006 Conditional Use permit for 3631 N Pasacal Ave
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
07-30-07-R
>
07-30-07 Item 4B, Planning Case 07-006 Conditional Use permit for 3631 N Pasacal Ave
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2022 11:32:03 AM
Creation date
7/26/2007 1:14:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Agenda Item 4B, Planning Case 07-006
General - Type
Agenda Item
Addressee
3631 Pascal AVenue North
Date
7/30/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 11,2007 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />B. PLANNING CASE #07-006 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; DAVID HAGEN. <br />3631 PASCAL AVENUE N - PUBLIC HEARING <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff stated the applicants are requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to <br />store a recreational vehicle (R V) that is between 28 and 34 feet long in the rear of their <br />property at 3631 North Pascal Avenue. Staff recommended approval of the conditional <br />use permit subject to the following nine conditions: <br /> <br />1. The landscaping shall be fully installed and inspected before the RV is stored on the <br />property. <br />2. The RV shall not be parked closer than fifteen feet to the rear or side property lines. <br />3. The applicant shall submit a $500 financial surety to the City which shall be returned <br />to the applicant provided the proposed evergreen trees are alive and in an acceptable <br />condition to the City Forester and City Planner no earlier than one year after the <br />installation of the trees. The landscaping inspection shall only occur during the <br />growing season. The surety shall be submitted prior to issuance of the conditional <br />use permit <br />4. The RV shall not be used for living, sleeping, or housekeeping purposes while being <br />stored in the City. <br />5. The RV shall be property licensed, owned by the property owner, in an operating <br />condition at all times, and movable at all times. <br />6. The RV shall not be permanently affixed to the ground or in a manner that would <br />prevent removal. <br />7. While stored, the RV shall be enclosed by a cover that is of a neutral, earth-tone <br />color. <br />8. The applicant shall demonstrate proof of ownership of the RV upon request from the <br />City. <br />9. The City Attorney shall draft a conditional use permit that shall be signed by the <br />applicant prior to storing the RV on the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Lehnhoff indicated he had received two emails. One dated July 11, 2007 from David <br />and Nancy Beamish, 1377 Arden Oaks Drive, stating: "I just wanted to contact you <br />regarding the hearing tonight on PC#07-006 - continued. We think you should keep the <br />regulations the city already has, we do not want 0 see RV's >28' parked in driveways for <br />long periods of time or to be stored outside. We have a 32' motorhome that is stored in a <br />storage lot when not in use. I don't like paying to store it but I really don't think it would <br />be in the best interest for our neighborhood to allow people to have >28' RV's at their <br />residence. " <br /> <br />The other email was dated July 9,2007 from Reed Byers, 1416 Arden Oaks Ct., stating: <br />"I had previously mentioned I feel the storing of these units takes away from the appeal <br />of living in our city. I think no RV's should be stored in the yards of our residents. I <br />would like to align myself with the appropriate council member to draft a resolution that <br />would not allow for this practice on or off paved surfaces. This is getting out of hand as I <br />look around other cities as well as our own. If you can afford these gas guzzlers, then <br />you can afford to have them stored out of town. I don't feel this CUP should be granted <br />to the Hagens or anyone else. There is just too much junk in people's yards. Pis relay <br />this message to the July 11 hearing as I will be out of town on business the 10th through <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.