Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The existing dwelling and accessory structure are single level structures and do not <br />exceed any height limits. The proposed dwelling would be at the 35 foot height limit, <br />and the relocated accessory structure would not exceed the height of the existing <br />accessory structure. <br /> <br />D. Side Setbacks - Variance Required <br /> <br />A variance is not needed for the side setbacks for the proposed new dwelling. <br /> <br />2. Variance 1: Dwelling Front/Rear Yard Setback Encroachment <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to construct a new dwelling that would be thirteen feet from the <br />westem property, which is within the required front or rear building setback. Depending on <br />the designation of Fairview Avenue as the front or rear property line, the following setbacks <br />would apply to the dwelling: <br /> <br /> Chart 4: Setback from Fairview Avenue ROW <br /> Proposed If Front Line If Rear Line <br /> Setback Standard Requested Standard Requested <br /> Setback Encroachment Setback Encroachment <br />PrinciDal (dwellino) 13 It 40 It 27 It 30 It 17 It <br /> <br />If the westem property line is designated as the rear line, the intensity of the encroachment <br />for the dwelling would be reduced from 27 feet to 17 feet. <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted a letter explaining the reasons for the requested setback <br />encroachment. The letter also includes proposed findings of fact to support the variance <br />request (Attachment 3D-I). The slope to Lake Johanna Boulevard is significant, and moving <br />the structure farther east to increase the setback from Fairview A venue would likely require a <br />reduction in the size of the proposed dwelling or hauling in significant amounts of fill. The <br />existing dwelling is quite a bit smaller than the proposed and dwelling, and it does not <br />encroach on any setbacks. <br /> <br />3. Variance 2: Nonconforming Accessory Structure Relocation and Rebuilding Variance <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 485.4 square foot accessory structure and <br />construct a new accessory structure that is of the same dimensions but moved slightly to the <br />north and east (Attachment 3D-3). The existing accessory structure is classified as <br />nonconfomling because it encroaches on the southern side and westem front/rear setbacks. <br />The new accessory structure would also encroach on the southem side and westem front/year <br />setbacks, though the extent of the encroachment would be reduced because the new structure <br />would be farther from the westem and south em property lines: <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Alee/lng/or July} J, 2007 <br /> <br />\lMcfro-iI/CI.lIslardeuhills\P/a/lningIPlmmillg Cases\2007\07-0J6 Gonzalez Variance (PC Table)1071 107 ~ PC Hepar! M G01lZo!ez Variancc.doc <br /> <br />Page 5 of 13 <br />