Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In early January 2007, the City sent a letter to Clear Channel informing them that the <br />electronic billboard sign was not permitted by the Arden Hills Sign Code and it should be <br />removed. Clear Channel stated that they believed the sign was in conformance with the <br />City's sign regulations. On January 24,2007, the City issued a Sign Code violation letter to <br />Clear Channel and requested that they submit a completed sign permit application and details <br />about the previous traditional billboard and the new electronic billboard (Attachment 4A-2). <br />A sign permit application was not submitted, and the City issued a citation. <br /> <br />Although Clear Channel contends that a sign permit application is not needed, they submitted <br />a sign permit application on May 21, 2007 (Attachment 4A-3). The City's Sign Code <br />requires the City Planner to approve or deny a sign permit within 30 days ofreceiving the <br />application or the application is automatically approved (Section 1220.03). <br /> <br />City Staff and the City Attorney met with Clear Channel on June 7, 2007, to discuss the <br />status of the submitted sign permit. Due to the controversial nature of the electronic <br />billboard sign and due to the interpretation by City Staffthat the electronic billboard is not in <br />conformance with the Sign Code, the City Planner issued a denial to Clear Channel on June <br />18, 2007 (Attachment 4A-2). The denial was needed to keep the process moving forward <br />and to allow the Planning Commission and City Council the ability to review the case. Clear <br />Channel submitted their official appeal of the City Planner's denial on July 2,2007 <br />(Attachment 4A-4). <br /> <br />Marvin Liszt of Bernick and Lifson and Tom McCarver of Clear Channel attended a work <br />session with the City Council and Planning Commission on the July 9,2007, to discuss the <br />status of the electronic billboard. At that meeting, the City Council came to a consensus that <br />the sign permit evaluation process should continue and, the Planning Commission should <br />review Clear Channel's appeal as required by the Sign Code appeal process (Section <br />1220.04). <br /> <br />Billboards in Arden Hills <br /> <br />There are only two billboard structures within Arden Hills, both of which are located in the <br />northeastern corner of the Interstate 35W and 694 intersection and both are owned by Clear <br />Channel, Inc. (Attachment 4A-l). The two billboard structures host a total offour sign faces <br />(each billboard structure has a sign face that displays to the east and west). Only one ofthe <br />sign faces is ofthe electronic billboard type. The other three sign faces are traditional static <br />billboards. <br /> <br />The Sign Code does not permit the construction of entirely new billboards or other off-site <br />signs in the City. The two remaining billboards are considered nonconforming. <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meetingfor August 1,2007 <br /> <br />IlMetro-inet.us\ardenhillslPlanninglP/anning CommissionWew-O/d Business\20071080107 - Clear Channel Sign Permit Application Denial <br />Appeal.doc <br /> <br />Page 2 of5 <br />