Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Options <br /> <br />The findings in this report are not specific enough to fully support approval or denial of <br />variances one. With a motion to approve or deny variance number one, the italicized criteria <br />must be addressed for the record: <br />1. The proposed addition is/is not a reasonable use in the R- 3 Zone because ... <br />2. The proposed addition willlwill not alter the essential character ofthe neighborhood or <br />the City because... <br />3. The circumstances in this planning case are/are not unique to the property because... <br />4. The variance is/is not based on economic considerations alone because. . . <br /> <br /> <br />Criteria 1, 2, and 4 are already addressed in the findings. Criteria three must be addressed prior <br />to making a motion. <br /> <br />I. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case <br />07-021 for a variance 1907 County Road D based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, <br />and the four conditions in the September 5, 2007, planning case report. <br /> <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07- <br />021 for a variance at 1907 County Road D based on the findings of fact and the submitted <br />plans in the September 5, 2007, planning case report. <br /> <br />3, Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-021 for a variance at <br />1907 County Road D based on the following findings of fact. . . <br /> <br />4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-021 for a variance at 1907 County Road D: a <br />specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. <br /> <br />Notice <br /> <br />Although a variance does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by <br />the City and mailed to properties within three-hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. <br /> <br />Resident Comment <br /> <br />The City has not received any comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Deadline for Aeencv Actions <br /> <br />The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 15,2007. <br />Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by October 13, 2007 (60 <br />days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 <br /> <br />IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslP/anninglP/anning Cases\2007\07-021 Rakow VariancelO90507 - PC Report - Rakow Variance.doc <br /> <br />Page 70f8 <br />