Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Hunters Park Homeowner's Association <br /> <br />In the early 1970s, the City approved a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to create the Hunters <br />Park neighborhood and homeowner's associations. The single family portion of Hunters Park is <br />built on approximately 29 acres of which seven acres are shared green space, almost three acres <br />are used for shared driveways, and the remaining 19 acres are divided into 84 single-family <br />residential homes. <br /> <br />A PUD can permit a great amount of flexibility for developments from the underlying zoning <br />regulations. The Arden Hills Town Homes on Hamline Avenue, the Edgewater Estates near the <br />southeastern corner of Round Lake, and the Town Homes of Lake Valentine on County Road E2 <br />are residential Planned Unit Developments. The Hunters Park PUD used the flexibility <br />permitted in the PUD process, and the neighborhood was designed with varying lot sizes, <br />structure setbacks, and lot coverages. Lots in the neighborhood range in size from 4,356 square <br />feet to 32,670 square feet with a median lot size of 7,187 square feet (half the lots are above and <br />half the lots are below this size). A number of the lots were permitted to have structures that did <br />not meet the underlying zoning requirements, which is a legitimate use of the PUD process. <br />Because the lot sizes and building locations were approved as part of the PUD process, they are <br />not considered nonconforming even if they do not meet the underlying R-3 zoning requirements. <br /> <br /> <br />In flexible PUD developments like the Hunters Park neighborhood, it is not uncommon for the <br />PUD to include an alternative set of regulations that supersede the underlying zoning regulations. <br />For example, the recently approved Traverse Business Center had a specific set of design <br />standards that replaced most of the regular Gateway Business (GB) zoning regulations. In the <br />case of the Hunters Park, alternative lot layout standards were not created, which means that the <br />underling R-3 regulations were left in place. Since most of the structures and lots do not meet <br />the R-3 Zoning regulations, virtually any change to the structures in Hunters Park required a <br />variance and a PUD amendment. Furthermore, it can be difficult to apply the R-3 regulations to <br />lot sizes that do not meet the minimum R-3 lot size. <br /> <br />The City Council considered approving an alternative set of regulations for the Hunters Park <br />neighborhood in 1985 (Planning Case 85-010). However, it was determined that an alternative <br />set of regulations for Hunters Park should not be created because the lots and structure layouts <br />were so varied in the original PUD that it would be very difficult to create a standard that is less <br />complicated than the existing process. The City Council did, however, approve a process for <br />evaluating future changes to structures in Hunters Park: <br />1. If additions or alterations to the homes do not require setback or coverage variances <br />from the R-3 Zone, only a building permit issued administratively by the City shall be <br />required. This removed the need for a PUD amendment with every change. <br />2. If additions or alterations to cluster homes do require additional variances of any kind <br />from the R-3 Zone, the standard variance procedure set by the City shall apply. <br />3. In both cases, the Architectural and Environmental Committee of the Hunter's Park <br />Homeowners Association shall review and approve the proposed addition or <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5,2007 <br /> <br />\\Metro.inet.uslardenhil/sIPlanningiP/anning Cases\2007\07-020 Bacig Variancel090507 - PC Report - Bacig Variance.doc <br /> <br />Page3of9 <br />