Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Options & Proposed Motion Lanl!ual!e <br /> <br />The question before the City Council is whether the Planning Commission correctly or <br />incorrectly upheld Staff's denial of the sign permit application. The City Council can now <br />uphold or overturn the Planning Commission's decision. <br /> <br />1. Support the Planning Commission's Denial of the Application: Motion to support the <br />Planning Commission's August 1,2007, denial of Clear Channel, Inc.'s, May 21,2007, <br />after-the- fact sign permit application based on the City's sign and zoning regulations as <br />presented in the June 18,2007, denial letter to Clear Channel, Inc. <br /> <br /> <br />2. Overturn the Planning Commission's Denial of the Application: Motion to overturn the <br />Planning Commission's August 1,2007, denial of Clear Channel, Inc.'s, May 21,2007, <br />after-the-fact sign permit application based on the following reasons... (reasons must be <br />stated for the record to support overturning Staff's denial of the sign permit application) <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />7D-1 Billboard Location Map <br />7D-2 Letters to Clear Channel from the City <br />7D-3 Clear Channel Sign Permit Application <br />7D-4 Clear Channel's Appeals to the City <br />7D-5 City Attorney's Response to Clear Channel's Appeals <br />7D-6 Dynamic Signage Research Report from SRF for the City of Minnetonka <br />7D-7 Draft Minutes from the August 1,2007, Planning Commission Meeting <br />7D-8 August 1,2007, Report to the Planning Commission (without attachments) <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Meeting - September 10, 2007 <br /> <br />IlMetro-inet.uslardenhil/slPlanningICity Council Memos\2007\Clear Channel Electronic BillboardlO91007 - Clear Channel-Permit Denial <br />Appeal.doc <br /> <br />Page 6 of6 <br />