Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The City sent a letter to Clear Channel informing them that the electronic billboard sign was not <br />permitted by the Arden Hills Sign Code and it should be restored to its previous condition. City <br />Staff met with Clear Channel on January 23. At that meeting, Clear Channel stated that they <br />believed the electronic billboard was in conformance with the City's sign regulations. On <br />January 24,2007, the City issued a Sign Code violation letter to Clear Channel and requested <br />that they submit a completed sign permit application, details about the previous billboard face, <br />and details about the new electronic billboard (Attachment 7D-2). A sign permit application was <br />not submitted within the requested fifteen days, and the City issued a citation to Clear Channel <br />for failing to submit the required sign permit. <br /> <br /> <br />Clear Channel submitted a sign permit application on May 21,2007 (Attachment 7D-3). The <br />City's Sign Code requires the City Planner to approve or deny a sign permit within 30 days of <br />receiving the application or the application is automatically approved (Section 1220.03). <br /> <br />City Staff and the City Attorney met with Clear Channel on June 7, 2007, to discuss the status of <br />the submitted sign permit. The City Attorney and City Staffs interpretation of the City's <br />ordinances was that the electronic billboard was not in conformance with the Sign Code, and the <br />City Planner issued a denial to Clear Channel on June 18,2007 (Attachment 7D-2). <br /> <br />Marvin Liszt, Bernick and Lifson law firm, and Tom McCarver, Clear Channel, attended a work <br />session with the City Council and Planning Commission on July 9,2007, to discuss the status of <br />the electronic billboard. At that meeting, the City Council came to a consensus that the sign <br />permit evaluation process should continue as prescribed in the Sign Code (Section 1220.04). <br /> <br />Planninl! Commission Hearinl! <br /> <br />Clear Channel submitted an appeal to the City Planner's denial on July 2, 2007 (Attachment 7D- <br />4). As required by the Sign Code, a hearing was held to review the sign permit denial at the <br />August 1,2007, Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission reviewed the <br />materials submitted by Clear Channel, Clear Channel presented the reasons for their appeal, and <br />Clear Channel responded to the Planning Commission's question. At the end of the hearing, the <br />Planning Commission voted (5-1) to affirm Staff s denial of Clear Channel's sign permit <br />application. The motion was based on the findings in Staffs June 18,2007, letter of denial to <br />Clear Channel (Attachment 7D-2). The draft minutes from the August 1,2007, Planning <br />Commission are included with this report (Attachment 7D-7). <br /> <br />Clear Channel submitted their appeal of the Planning Commission's decision on August 14,2007 <br />(Attachment 7D-4). A letter sent to City Attorney Filla is also included in Attachment 7D-4. <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Meeting - September 10, 2007 <br /> <br />\\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanningICity Council Memos\2007\Clear Channel Electronic Bil/board1091007 - Clear Channel- Permit Denial <br />Appeal.doc <br /> <br />Page 2 of6 <br /> <br />