My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-07 Item 7D, Clear Channel
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
09-10-07-R
>
09-10-07 Item 7D, Clear Channel
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2007 3:04:45 PM
Creation date
9/6/2007 3:00:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Item 7D, Clear Channel Signage
General - Type
Agenda Item
Date
9/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />BILLBOARDS in the <br />DIGITAL AGE <br />J <br /> <br /> <br />IMAGINE DRIVING along a twisting, two-lane <br />Alabama road at night. As you slow for a curve, suddenly <br />an enormous television screen pops into your field of vision, <br />temporarily blinding you before flashing an ad for an insur- <br />ance company. <br /> <br />The glaring lights of this particular sign, slapped up in subur- <br />ban Vestavia Hills, blindsided city zoning officials as well. They <br />had unknowingly given entree to digital billboard technology <br />when they approved what appeared to be a routine application <br />to add lighting to a sign grandfathered in years ago. The appli- <br />cation made no mention of changeable messages and gave no <br />indication it would transform an old, static board into a giant <br />vehicle for digital TV-like images. <br /> <br />Police officers immediately complained the board posed a major <br />safety hazard. Neighbors complained about the glaring lights. <br />Lamar Advertising Company. which owns the board, claimed <br />they'd made the changes in "good faith," <br /> <br />Anyone who has been following the digital-billboard movement <br />may recognize that argument as a popular tactic employed by <br />an industry that finds it easier to ask localities for forgiveness <br />than permission. It's one of many strategies being used to bring <br />digital technology to as many cities and towns as possible, <br />before localities have a chance to explore the implications <br />of the new technology, update their sign ordinances, or ban <br />digital signs outright. <br /> <br />"There's a full-court press going on at the national, state, and <br />local level, being waged by Lamar, Clear Channel, and CBS <br />Outdoor," said Bill Brinton, an attorney specializing in sign <br />law and a member of the board of Scenic America. Lobbyists <br />are pushing state legislators to pass bills that clear the way for <br />LED (light-emitting diode) signs on state and federal roads, <br />and the industry is pressuring state departments of transpor- <br />tation to rewrite regulations to allow them to transform static <br />signs into digital boards. And in cities and counties aCI:OSS <br />America, they are pressing for looser sign ordinances or simply <br />installing the new technology without permission to do so. <br /> <br />"For in-your-ftce results that won't end <br />in a restraining order, out-ofhome is <br />the only way to go." <br /> <br />www.lalllilroutdoor.com <br /> <br />Digital signs are far more of a threat than their predecessors, <br />said Kevin Fry, president of Scenic America. They're brighter, <br />which makes them visible from far greater distances; they're <br />much more distracting, because of their brightness and because <br />the messages are constandy changing; they're often taller than <br />regular boards, giving the appearance oflarge, plasma-screen <br />TVs; and they're substantially more expensive to remove, so <br />localities without amortization laws could find themselves <br />unable to afford taking them down. 1his would be especially <br />true for signs along federal-aid highways where the use of <br />amortization is prohibited by the Highway Beautification Act. <br /> <br />Despite higher installation costs, the profitability of digital <br />boards provides a powerful incentive for companies to put up <br />as many as possible. Clear Channel Outdoor spent $3.5 million <br />converting seven static boards to digital in Cleveland, but watched <br />revenue jump from $300,000 to $3 million in the netw-ork's <br />first year, according to Mark P. Mays, Clear Channel's CEO. <br /> <br />That's because digital boards allow companies to sell ad space <br />to 10 times as many clients as static ones; most signs change <br />messages every six seconds. They also allow advertisers to change <br />content several times a day or week, and unlike the static <br />boards, which require contractors to change messages manually, <br />digital boards allow operators to change content from remote <br />locations in a matter of seconds, with just a click of a mouse. <br /> <br />Lamar Advertising boasts that it has digital billboards in as <br />many as 44 states. Clear Channel, the world's largest outdoor <br />advertising company, is similarly upfront about its goals <br />for spreading digital technology. In a November 2006 press <br />release announcing the launch of multi-sign digital networks <br />in Milwaukee and Tampa, Clear Channel Outdoor Global <br />President Paul Meyer put it blundy: ~ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.