Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 9, 2007 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />Ms. Olson summarized the Sheehy Tennis Court Lease Agreement. She recommended Council, <br />allow staff further time to evaluate all potential uses of this site. Therefore, staff recommends <br />approval of a temporary restated and amended lease agreement dated April 9, 2007 allowing. <br />Arden Hills Association #3 to have exclusive use of the Sheehy Tennis Court from April 9; 2007 <br />until December 31, 2007. Staff will bring back a comprehensive report to a future meeting for <br />further discussion. <br /> <br />MOTION; Councilmcmbcr Holden moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a <br />motion to approve a Temporary Restated and Amended Lease Agreement <br />dated April 9, 2007 Allowing Arden Hills Association #3 to Have <br />Exclusive Use of the Sheehy Tennis Court from April 9, 2007 through <br />December 31, 2007. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated she would be voting against this because she believed they <br />violated the original lease by not paying the City and not maintaining the Court. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated he would also be voting against this for the same reasons as <br />well as having an exclusive lease for land that was donated to the City. He requested staff send <br />this to the PTRC and come back with a proposal. <br /> <br />Councilmembcr Holmes stated she believed this should be extended for another year, but <br />agreed the PTRC should look at this. She stated she did not believe anybody outside of the <br />association would play tennis on this Court anyway. She noted they did need a diSCUSSion on <br />how they could get the association to maintain the court. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated he believed this was a reasonable request and he would be voting in <br />favor of the motion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated he would be voting in favor of the motion because by the <br />association obtaining the insurance it was a better situation then not having insurance and he <br />believed allowing staff additional time to evaluate this was appropriate. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated she believed if the court was maintained, it would be used by the <br />public. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung noted there has not been any upkeep to the faeility and it was in poor <br />shape and simply extending this to deal with the liability issues was not enough for him to vote in <br />favor of this. <br /> <br />Todd Elbertson, Association Representative, stated shortly after they signed the agreement, <br />they did have the court power washed and the cracks filled. He noted before they did this again, <br />they wanted to have assurance that they had a new agreement. He indicated the court was due <br />again for this type of maintenance. <br /> <br />The motion carried (3-2 Councilmembers Holden and McClung opposed). <br />