Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br /> <br />Public Works Director Hoag introduced Mr. Dale Maul and Mr. John Huseby, Bolton & Menk, <br />Inc., the consultants selected to assist the City in the review of the Environmental Assessment <br />(EA). <br /> <br />CounciImember McClung commented he attended the MnlDOT meeting. He stated he was <br />concerned that residents assumed a noise wall would be built, which is not accurate per the EA <br />document. <br /> <br />Mr. Maul summarized the project details. He referenced the draft letter addressing traffic, <br />social, economic, and environmental, land use and right-of-way, and water resources. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead commented he took away from the draft letter that not all the traffic impacts <br />were properly reflected in the environmental assessment. Mr. Maul replied Bolton and Menk <br />recommends looking at the impact of other projects in the foreseeable future. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated he specifically noticed the impact on Lexington Avenue and the <br />displaced traffic from 1-694. He asked ifthe peak volumes on Lexington reflect the displacement <br />from Snelling. Mr. Maul replied they asked MnlDOT to take into consideration other particular <br />variables. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead pointed out that he did not notice the impact ofI-694/1-35W discussed in the <br />analysis. He asked if there was a sense that the capacity to handle the traffic was sufficiently <br />addressed. Mr. Huseby replied he believed it was addressed adequately. He stated they <br />recommended MnDOT look at traffic redistribution again. <br /> <br />CounciImember McClung questioned whether the City is being strong enough in what it is <br />asking for. Mr. Maul replied he and Mr. Huseby are both former MnlDOT employees and <br />believe they have formulated the questions MnlDOT would need to address. He commented <br />MnIDOT would be required to answer the questions as well as address the City's concerns. <br /> <br />CounciImember Holden questioned the right-of-way and the impact to residents. She asked how <br />the land would be left after a temporary easement is used. Mr. Maul replied the land is retumed <br />to its original condition and the land owner is also reimbursed for the use of the temporary <br />easement. <br /> <br />CounciImember Holden inquired as to how the need for a sound wall is determined. Mr. Maul <br />replied a sound wall is determined by the decibel threshold. CounciImember Holden asked if <br />sound walls were mandatory if standards are met. <br /> <br />Mr. Maul replied they were not. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead asked if this is the point where the City requests MnIDOT to monitor noise <br />more in the middle of Trunk Highway 10 rather than on 1-694. Mr. Maul replied this could be <br />done. Mayor Harpstead recommended this be done. <br />