My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1B Tree Preservation Ordinance
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
10-22-07-Special
>
Item 1B Tree Preservation Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2007 9:46:37 AM
Creation date
10/18/2007 9:44:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Tree Preservation Ordinance
General - Type
Agenda Item
Date
10/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. Reducing tree loss during redevelopment <br />. Reducing damage to standing trees during construction <br />. Providing replacement of trees lost during construction <br />· Providing for planting trees where none occurred previously <br />· Providing for maintenance of preserved trees after construction is complete <br />. Reducing tree loss with new plats and minor subdivisions <br /> <br />This list is far from exhaustive and the goals are not mutually exclusive; however, this is meant <br />to be a starting point for further discussion. The above goals could apply to residential <br />properties, commercial/industrial properties, or both. As discussed in the scope section of this <br />report, it would be helpful to determine if one or both types of properties should be included. <br /> <br />Scope <br /> <br />The scope of the ordinance, and the policies that will accompany it, will set the tone and <br />determine how much regulation a local authority desires to assert over the protection and/or <br />preservation of its forest resource. <br /> <br />The scope of this tree preservation ordinance is likely to include commercial, industrial, large- <br />scale residential developments, and subdivisions submitted after the date of adoption of the <br />ordinance. It could also include building additions, construction on individual residential lots, or <br />any other project that requires a grading or building permit from the city. The scope and extent <br />to which the ordinance affects development is up to the Council. Many tree preservation <br />ordinances also affect other types ofprojects: <br />. single and two-family lots, <br />. parking lot expansions beyond a certain percent, <br />. building additions, <br />. a large amount of on-site grading above a certain percent, <br />. building footprint expansions, <br />. or any other proj ect that increases the impervious surface of a lot above a certain percent. <br /> <br />Regardless of scope, a tree survey will be required for those projects which are determined to fall <br />under the purview of the new ordinance. This survey must identify the significant or high <br />priority trees on the site, their sizes, root zone, and species. <br /> <br />In addition to identifYing which properties will be affected by the tree preservation ordinance, <br />this code must also indicate the level of regulation to be undertaken, the extent to which lost trees <br />must be mitigated or replaced, and penalties for not complying with the regulations. Tree <br />preservation ordinances can be developed to coincide with current zoning or property <br />subdivision regulations in the form oflandscape requirements. They can be very simple or <br />complex in their scope. For example, a simple ordinance may stipulate that the cutting of any <br />tree larger than a certain diameter can be done only by permit and must be within a designated <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Work Session for October 22, 2007 <br /> <br />llAhdocsl\AHIAHdatalPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\OX-OXXTree Preservation Ordinancel102207 - CC Work Session - Tree Preservation. doc <br /> <br />Page 3 of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.