My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1B Tree Preservation Ordinance
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
10-22-07-Special
>
Item 1B Tree Preservation Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2007 9:46:37 AM
Creation date
10/18/2007 9:44:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Tree Preservation Ordinance
General - Type
Agenda Item
Date
10/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />They have also identified woodland preservation areas and buffer/screening areas that limit tree <br />destruction regardless of tree size. <br /> <br />Replacement <br /> <br />Tree replacement is a simple concept, but to be equitable it can become a very complex <br />procedure. For example, an ordinance may require that the loss of a 30-inch diameter tree must <br />be replaced with the planting of fifteen two-inch diameter trees. However, it can be difficult and <br />sometimes impossible to find enough suitable planting locations for the replacement trees. In <br />addition, this particular approach can fail to mitigate the environmental effect of mature tree loss. <br />Other ordinances require that percentages of specific sizes and species of trees must be replaced <br />based on what was there before the development occurred. <br /> <br />A variety of replacement strategies are possible including: <br />. requiring developers to set aside wooded areas as preserves; <br />. sliding scales that require greater replacement of caliper inches as the size of the <br />impacted tree increases; <br />. percentage replacement which requires that a certain percentage of each parcel be <br />wooded, typically this is designated by zoning district; <br />· flexible no-net loss formulas that require developers to replace 100 percent ofthe caliper <br />inches lost, either on site or off site. <br />. Or combinations of the above that require tree replacement based on the location and size <br />of the trees lost. <br /> <br />Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, none is perfect. When replacement oftrees <br />is included in an ordinance, the questions, "why, how much, and where?" need to be primary <br />considerations. <br /> <br />Incentives <br /> <br />Developing an ordinance which creates incentives can be a positive way to achieve compliance. <br />Many incentives exist to encourage tree preservation. The priorities set by the City Council will <br />dictate how much or if incentives will be written into the code to encourage the type of <br />development that is most desirable. If the goal is to create a policy of preservation, then the <br />intent of a tree preservation ordinance should be to provide incentives for unique and creative <br />project designs that complement the woodlands and replace excessive tree loss. <br /> <br />Such incentives could include: <br />. Setback reductions for trees saved <br />. Height or density transfers for trees saved <br />. Unit bonuses for land dedicated for replanting, or trees saved <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Work Session for October 22, 2007 <br /> <br />\lAhdocsJIAHlAHdatalPlanning\Planning Cases\2007\OX-OXXTree Preservation Ordinauce\102207 - CC Work Session - Tree Preservation.doc <br /> <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.