My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-29-07 Item 4G, Employee Health Insurance
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
10-29-07-R
>
10-29-07 Item 4G, Employee Health Insurance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2007 10:43:28 AM
Creation date
10/25/2007 10:42:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Item 4G, Employee Health Insurance
General - Type
Agenda Item
Date
10/29/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memo <br />City Council <br />2008 Health Insurance Benefit Options <br />2 <br /> <br />VEBA account would receive the benefit and the Co-Pay (or Deductible) plan single coverage <br />participants would forfeit the excess dollars of City contribution over actual premium cost (this would <br />provide a possible incentive to get participants to switch to this plan and solve our legal problem). <br /> <br />Staff has done an analysis on pairing up the plans and the impact on employees using their current <br />contributions for health, dental and Flex spending accounts. The City cost in these analysis was done <br />using the contribution as it would be ifno changes were made, thus impacting the budget by 5.4% over <br />last year based on 2007 elections for health coverage by employees. When comparing the HSA and <br />VEBA plans, the HSA has the most favorable impact and least exposure to participants. As an added <br />incentive to move toward this plan, the Council may wish to increase their contribution to those that <br />choose the HSA. This could be done using a lump sum extra contribution, for example $100, $500, etc. <br />Choosing HSA does have implications of additional exposure with increased deductibles. Staff has done <br />an analysis of this additional exposure. Most employees have limited impact and those that have a greater <br />impact would still be able to choose the Co-pay plan. The analysis also showed that those with the most <br />additional exposure were not currently contributing additional funds toward flexible spending accounts <br />and they would have the opportunity to contribute more dollars into their HSA. <br /> <br />The additional exposure is noted because of the higher deductible, but extra contributions are allowed. <br />Please remember these are savings accounts and the balances accumulate if not used. Many times the <br />employee may not incur the full deductible and these savings accounts also encourage them to be more <br />prudent in their spending and health care choices <br /> <br />Staff has analyzed and determined that the Co-Pay option and the HSA option seem to be the optimal <br />choice. The City contribution was constant on all plans analyzed, but the HSA seems to offer more <br />advantages to the employees, thus providing more incentive. The majority of our participants are <br />currently in the Co-Pay plan, thus the reason to pick this over the Deductible option. <br /> <br />Flex Savinl!s Account Options <br /> <br />Staff also reviewed our current Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA) for health care and dependent care <br />expenses. In comparing our current vendor Acclaim with other options, SelectAccount (offered through <br />Blue Cross) will provide us with additional cost savings. SelectAccount will also provide more benefits <br />to participants and provide additional savings on the HSA option (HSA fees would be waived if stacked <br />with the FSA). <br /> <br />Recommended Action: <br /> <br />A motion to approve pairing the Co-Pay option with the HSA option and changing our FSA <br />administration from Acclaim to SelectAccount effective January 1, 2008. <br /> <br />A motion to approve a City contribution for 2008 of $648 per month, per employee. This will result in a <br />5.4% increase for medical coverage even though there is premium increase of 7%. Furthermore, there <br />will be additional cost savings for the FSA administration. <br /> <br />A motion to direct staff to have the City's insurance brokers prepare the necessary documents, and <br />authorize the City Administrator to sign and execute all documents. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.