My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-07 FPAC Minutes
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Financial Planning and Analysis Committee (FPAC)
>
FPAC Packets
>
2007
>
06-20-07 FPAC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/24/2024 4:07:07 PM
Creation date
11/9/2007 2:19:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
06-20-07 Minutes
General - Type
Minutes
Date
6/20/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
By comparison,there are also government investment pools with the investment objective of <br /> maximizing return. These pools invest in longer-term securities, subjecting their portfolios and their • <br /> participants to greater market price volatility. These pools are variable Net Asset Value(NAV)pools <br /> and introduce market risk to the investor through a fluctuating NAV. The principal invested in the pool <br /> may not be the same principal returned to the investor depending on the movement of interest rates. <br /> These pools would not be appropriate for funds that must be liquid and stable. They may be appropriate <br /> for lo <br /> nger-term strategies. <br /> Some other differences among pools include their legal structure,authorized investments,procedures for <br /> depositing and withdrawing money, and their services. Each pool has a process that a participant must <br /> complete,including documents to be signed and banking information to be provided,in order to <br /> establish an account. Sources of information for evaluating pools may include a pool offering <br /> statement, investment policy or audited financial statements. <br /> Ratings for LGIPs: Investors should remember that LGIPs are not registered with the Securities and <br /> Exchange Commission(SEC) and are exempt from SEC regulatory requirements because they fall under <br /> a governmental exclusion clause. While this exemption allows pools greater flexibility,it also reduces <br /> investor protection. Investments in these pools are not insured or guaranteed and substantial losses have <br /> occurred in the past. Some rating agencies rate LGIPs using the same criteria as money market mutual <br /> funds. These ratings are based on safety of principal and ability to maintain a NAV of$1. Pool ratings <br /> can provide an additional method of due diligence. <br /> Recommendation. The Government Finance Officers Association(GFOA)makes the following <br /> recommendations to government investors when using Local Government Investment Pools(LGIPs): <br /> 1. Government investors should confirm LGIPs are eligible investments under governing law • <br /> and the government's investment policy. <br /> 2. Government investors should fully understand the investment objectives, legal structure and <br /> operating procedures of the investment pool before they place any money in the pool. When <br /> evaluating an LGIP, investors should read the pool's offering statement,investment policy, <br /> audited financial statements carefully. <br /> 3. Particular attention must be paid to the investment objectives of a pool to determine whether <br /> a pool seeks to maintain a constant NAV of$1.00 or could have a fluctuating NAV. This <br /> information is essential in order to determine which pools are appropriate for liquidity <br /> strategies(constant NAV) and which ones are only appropriate for longer-term strategies <br /> (fluctuating NAV). <br /> 4. The pool's list of eligible securities should be reviewed to determine compliance with the <br /> participating government's investment policy. Portfolio maturity restrictions and <br /> diversification policies should be evaluated to determine potential market and credit risks. <br /> 5. Portfolio pricing practices should be evaluated. <br /> 6. Custodial policies(e.g.,delivery versus payment) should be reviewed. <br /> 7. The qualifications and experience of the portfolio manager,management team and/or <br /> investment adviser should be evaluated. <br /> 8. The earnings performance history should be studied and reviewed relative to other <br /> investment alternatives. On constant NAV LGIP funds,the current yield of the portfolio can <br /> be compared with competitive institutional money market funds,or overnight repurchase <br /> agreement rates. Standard& Poor's releases an index of LGIPs on a weekly basis that reports <br /> the average 7-and 30-day yields and average maturities of LGIPs holding its highest ratings <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.