My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1C, 2008 Proposed Compensation Plan
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
11-19-07-WS
>
Item 1C, 2008 Proposed Compensation Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2007 4:24:05 PM
Creation date
11/15/2007 4:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
11-19-07 Item 1C Compensation Plan
General - Type
Agenda Item
Date
11/19/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />~~HILLS <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />November 19, 2007 <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM: 1.c. <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br /> <br />Michelle Wolfe, City Administrator ~ <br /> <br /> <br />Pay Equity and Compensation Study <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />At the September 17 City Council Work Session, the City's compensation consultant, Mr. Rod <br />Kelsey, presented pay equity and compensation plan information. A follow-up discussion was <br />scheduled for September 24. At the conclusion of that discussion, Council directed that a <br />subcommittee of the Council work with staff and Mr. Kelsey to develop a recommendation back <br />to the full Council. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />At the September 24 Work Session, Council discussed which quartile should be used for market <br />comparisons. The City has not had a clear stated policy in the past regarding which quartile of <br />the market should be used for comparisons. While there was consensus from Council that the <br />60th percentile would be a goal to work toward, Council concluded that it could not accomplish <br />that goal in one year. Council also discussed the desire to be competitive in the local <br />government marketplace and a discussion ensured regarding what constituted a comparable <br />jurisdiction. Council discussed separating Level 13, City Administrator, from the rest of the <br />plan. Finally, the Council requested new matrices that were more closely tied to the market <br />survey data. Council also asked that the new matrices be prepared based on the 55th percentile. <br /> <br />The Council subcommittee met with City staff and the consultant on November 9. At that <br />meeting, the group reviewed revised market-based pay matrices using the 55th percentile. In <br />other words, the range maximums were based on a percentage of the survey market data. The <br />difference between each pay grade was not an equal percentage (previous drafts were <br />constructed with an equal percentage between each pay grade). The subcommittee was <br />comfortable with this approach. <br /> <br />After discussing the topic of comparison communities, the subcommittee decided to remove <br />Shoreview from the list. Shoreview has not been used in previous studies for the City; it was <br />suggested during a work session this past summer that we should include them for study <br />purposes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.