My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1C, 2008 Proposed Compensation Plan
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
11-19-07-WS
>
Item 1C, 2008 Proposed Compensation Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2007 4:24:05 PM
Creation date
11/15/2007 4:21:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
11-19-07 Item 1C Compensation Plan
General - Type
Agenda Item
Date
11/19/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Summary of Job Evaluation Factors in the RDK Job Evaluation System <br />( Including Rating Parameters for Each Factor) <br /> <br /> <br />Formal Preparation and Experience <br /> <br />This jDb evaluatiDn factor is applied tD determine the mDst representative cDmbinatiDn of formal preparatiDn <br />(SchoDling at whatever level) and relevant UDb-linked) experience typically required to qualifv for the <br />position being evaluated. It is important in this factDr tD verify the minimum acceptable qualificatiDns fDr the <br />pDsitiDn being evaluated. [There are tWD decisions made Dn this factor - one related tD formal preparatiDn <br />and Dne made related tD relevant experience.] <br /> <br /> <br />~ The 2 rating parameters fDr this factDr go from ND Required SDecificatiDns tD DoctDrate (eight levels) <br />for fDrmal preparation and gD from 0 to 12+ vears (eight levels) fDr years Df relevant experience. <br /> <br />Decision Maklna (fmpactl <br /> <br />This job evaluation factor is applied tD determine the regular and ongDing freedom tD act; the extent Df the <br />DrganizatiDn affected by thDse actiDns; and the best characterization Df decisiDn-making typical Df the <br />positiDn being evaluated. [There are three decisiDns made Dn this factor - Dne related tD the degree Df <br />freedom tD act; Dne related tD the extent Df such judgments; and Dne related tD the nature of decisiDn <br />making.] <br /> <br />~ The 3 rating parameters fDr this factDr gD from Least to Inclusive (six levels) fDr impact and gD from <br />JDb-Centered tD OrqanizatiDn-wide (fDur levels) for extent Df decisiDn making and gD from Ancillarv to <br />Final (fDur levels) for type Df decisiDn making. <br /> <br />Thinkina ChaJ/enaes and Problem So/vina <br /> <br />This jDb evaluatiDn factor is applied tD determine the representative thinking challenges and problem <br />sDlving required on an ongDing basis and thereafter the depth Df intellectual respDnse tD thDse challenges <br />and creativity invDlved in solving problems. [There are tWD decisions made Dn this factor - one related tD <br />the cDntext and cDmplexity Df challenges I problems and one related tD the depth Df respDnse required to <br />address and resDlve such challenges and problems.] <br /> <br />~ The 2 rating parameters fDr this factDr gD from LDW to Dealinq with Governance Issues fDr cDntext and <br />cDmplexity (seven levels) and gD from Make Clearcut ChDices tD DevelDD Oriqinal. Creative SDlutiDns <br />(five levels) for responses. <br /> <br />Interactions and Communications <br /> <br />This jDb evaluatiDn factDr is applied tD determine the cDntext of business-related interactions and <br />cDmmunications that are an Dngoing part Df performing the pDsitiDn being evaluated. [There are two <br />decisiDns made Dn this factDr - one related tD the type and cDntext Df business interactions and Dne related <br />tD the impact Df the outcDmes and effects on infDrmatiDn cDntent and fiow throughDUt the DrganizatiDn.] <br /> <br />~ The 2 rating parameters fDr this factDr go from ResDonses Provided tD Others fDr cDntext Df <br />cDmmunications to InteractiDns CDnsistentlv FDcused on Critical OoeratiDnal/GDvernance Issues (6 <br />levels) and gD from Effective WDrkinq RelatiDnshios tD Dealinq with the MDSt MaiDr ODeratiDnal I <br />GDvernance Issues (five levels) fDr Dutcomes and effects. <br /> <br />Work Environment <br /> <br />This jDb evaluation factDr is applied to determine the pDtential fDr injury in performing the pDsitiDn being <br />evaluated and also determine what recDgnized health hazards regularly exist in the typical work <br />environment of the pDsition being evaluated. [There are two decisiDns made Dn this factDr - Dne related to <br />potential fDr injury and Dne cDvering the recDgnized health hazards in the work environment.] <br /> <br />~ The 2 rating parameters fDr this factDr gD from Minimal PDtential to ContinuDus PDtential (6 levels) and <br />gD from Low to Hiqh (3 levels) for physical requirements. <br /> <br />RILEY, DETTMANN & KELSEY LLC <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.