Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In order to make room for the two new antennas at the 152 foot level, the Sprint is proposing to <br />remove a Nextel antenna at the 154 foot level. Removing the Nextel antenna will create room <br />for one of the proposed new Sprint antennas at the 152 foot level. The other proposed Sprint <br />antenna at the 152 foot level would be in a location that previously did not have an antenna. <br />Since the total number ofNextel antennas is decreasing and the replacement antennas are not <br />outside ofthe approved leased area for Nextel, the Nextel antenna removal does not require a <br />CUP or a lease amendment. Although under a different lease, Nextel is owned by Sprint, and <br />Sprint has authorized the Nextel antenna change. <br /> <br />The applicant has submitted two letters from Henry Bellagamba, an engineer with Fullerton <br />Engineering Consultants who prepared the engineering drawings for the proposed plans <br />(Included in the October 3, 2007 Report to the Planning Commission). According to these <br />letters, the proposed changes to the antenna configuration on the water tower will not exceed the <br />structural capacity ofthe guardrails on which they would be mounted and that by engineering <br />judgment the existing guardrail structure is adequate. <br /> <br />The City Engineer reviewed the project and submitted a memo dated May 23, 2007 (included in <br />the October 3, 2007 Report to the Planning Commission) with recommended conditions; these <br />have been included as conditions for approval. The City Engineer does not anticipate structural <br />issues associated with this proposed project. The Public Works Director has also reviewed the <br />changes and does not have any concerns based on the submitted plans. <br /> <br />There are no proposed changes to the existing ground equipment at the site. The result ofthis <br />CUP amendment would be a net reduction of seven cellular antenna mounts and three actual <br />antennas on the water tower. The vacated space at the 60 and 100 foot levels of the water tower <br />would revert back to the City's control and could be leased to other companies. <br /> <br />Sprint-Nextel <br /> <br />Sprint leased the twelve antenna mounts at the 60, 80, and 100 foot levels from the City in 2000. <br />Nextelleased the nine antennas mounts at the 154 foot level in 1995. In 2004, Sprint purchased <br />Nextel; however, the leases have remained separate, in part because they use different cellular <br />communication technologies. The cellular technology used by the Sprint side of the company, <br />called CDMA, is different from the cellular technology used by the Nextel side of the company, <br />which is called iDEN. <br /> <br />Cellular Antenna Lease Rate Comparison <br /> <br />Staff contacted the cities of Roseville, New Brighton, Shoreview, Mounds View, and Vadnais <br />Heights in order to compare lease rates for cellular antenna on water towers and other city owned <br />structures of similar heights. It is difficult to make direct comparisons because the circumstances <br />of each tower is somewhat unique due to different population densities, structure densities, <br />ground elevation, the total number of antennas at each site, and the ground elevation of antennas <br /> <br />\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\PlanninglPlanning Cases12007\07-024 Sprint-Nextel CUP (ec Tabled)\! J 2607 - CC Report - Sprint CUP <br />Amendment.doc <br /> <br />Page 2 of5 <br /> <br />