Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. The proposed addition is/is not a reasonable use in the R-l Zone because... <br />2. The proposed addition will/will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or <br />the City because... <br />3. The circumstances in this planning case are/are not unique to the property because... <br />4. The variance is/is not based on economic considerations alone because. . . <br /> <br /> <br />Criteria 1, 2, and 4 are already addressed in the findings. Criteria three must be addressed for the <br />record prior to making a motion. <br /> <br />1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case <br />07-029 for a variance at 1455 Skiles Lane based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, <br />and the six conditions in the December 5, 2007, planning case report. <br /> <br />2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07- <br />029 for a variance at 1455 Skiles Lane based on the findings offacts and the submitted plans <br />in the December 5, 2007, planning case report. <br /> <br />3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-029 for a variance at <br />1455 Skiles Lane based on the following findings offact... <br /> <br />4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-029 for a variance at 1455 Skiles Lane: a specific <br />reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. <br /> <br />Notice <br /> <br />Although a variance does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by <br />the City and mailed to properties within three-hundred fifty (350) feet ofthe subject property. <br /> <br />Resident Comment <br /> <br />The City has received letters from three of Mr. and Mrs, Wessberg's neighbors indicating their <br />support for the project (Attachment 3A-2). <br /> <br />Deadline for Al!encv Actions <br /> <br />The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 5, <br />2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by January 4, 2007 <br />(60 days), nnless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day <br />review period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the <br />120 days. <br /> <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Meetingfor December 5, 2007 <br /> <br />llAhdocsllAH1AHdataIP/anningIPlanning Cases\2007\07-029 Wessberg Variance (PENDING)\l20507 - PC Reporl- Wessberg Variance.doc <br /> <br />Page 8 of9 <br />