Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS TCAAP CC/PC/ADVISORY GROUP WORK SESSION -JULY 12, 2007 4 <br /> <br />nn. <br /> <br />00. <br />pp. <br /> <br />qq. <br /> <br />IT. <br /> <br />ss. <br /> <br />tt. <br /> <br />uu. <br /> <br />vv. <br /> <br />ww. <br /> <br />xx. <br /> <br />yy. <br /> <br />ZZ. <br /> <br />aaa. <br /> <br />bbb. <br /> <br />ccc. <br /> <br />ddd. <br /> <br />eee. <br /> <br />fff. <br />ggg. <br /> <br />hhh. <br /> <br />111. <br /> <br />JJJ. <br />kkk. <br /> <br />Ill. <br /> <br />mmm. <br /> <br />Fran - people want to !mow if their taxes are going to go up due to development at <br />TCAAP. <br />Bruce - we tried to address this concem in the Q and A newsletter that went out in April. <br />Liz - people may get more concerned about these issues as the plan gets closer to gaining <br />approval. <br />Larry - some in the community think the land should be divided up and sold to <br />developers. <br />Mayor - a major fear to that idea is that the site could not get cleaned up to residential <br />standards. <br />Jim - sees the development at TCAAP as one that should provide a positive impact to <br />taxpayers. <br />Willie - would like to see (in layman's terms) the financial model for development at <br />TCAAP. <br />Lyle - is involved in the discussions about environmental clean up and suffice it to say <br />that the situation is manageable. <br />Clay - would also like to see a simple financial model - existing vs. proposed <br />development. <br />Bruce - we will work with Ehlers and City Staff to get some basic information out to the <br />public. <br />Dave S. - can we see some development flexibility? A time frame for development? A <br />cleanup time frame? <br />Dave S. - zoning can provide some flexibility to market conditions. Maybe the condo <br />market will rebound. The plan should allow to make adjustments to accommodate <br />changes. <br />Larry - would hate to see the plan become so single family oriented it becomes <br />unattractive to young people. <br />Dave G./Dave Mc - the single family residential program is still a small percentage of <br />the total residential units. <br />Vince - should we eliminate the lot lines on the plan for the open house? <br />Jeff - that may be too confusing for people to grasp. The lot lines help understand scale <br />relationships better. <br />Fran - we shouldn't show the Hwy 10/96 configuration on the plan - it is unresolved. <br />Dave S. - disagrees. There must be some entrance to the TCAAP development offHwy <br />10. <br />Fran - agrees the access off 10 is needed but the rest of the design is up in the air. <br />Mayor - the design shown on the plan is still the best option. It would be disingenuous <br />to hide it. It should stay on the plan. <br />Dave Mc - either way is a problem (showing the hwy 10/96 interchange and not showing <br />it) <br />Willie - as a resident, would rather see more information than less in order to make an <br />informed decision. <br />Dave Mc - that interchange is still a controversy. <br />Fran - is concemed the trails have not been discussed. We should not show a design <br />element (trails) before it has been discussed. <br />Dave S. - Let's focus on the big picture items and not let the forest get lost in the trees. <br />We've been working on this plan for 20 years now and would hate to see us lose our <br />vision and momentum for the planning over trails. <br />Dave S. what is going on with the Athletic Fields? What is the parcel shape? What is <br />the Guard's role in it's development? <br />