My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-23-07-S
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
07-23-07-S
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2008 10:58:53 AM
Creation date
1/22/2008 10:52:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
07-23-07 Special Minutes
General - Type
Minutes
Date
7/23/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 23, 2007 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />A resident raised the concern with the ability for traffic to make a left turn off of Snelling onto <br />Highway 96. Mayor Harpstead indicated that the engineers will have to study that as they <br />proceed with design engineering. The resident stated that there won't be much of a gap with out <br />a signal there to provide a break to make the turn. Mayor Harpstead responded that the engineers <br />will have to study that issue. <br /> <br />A resident raised the concern that by widening Highway 96 it will become a by-pass for 1-694, <br />and removing the signal will make traffic flows even worse. Noise and traffic will increase and <br />residents will be closed in. It would be good to have a noise barrier. <br /> <br />A resident, Jolene Poucher, stated that the Briarlmoll neighborhood concern is with turning onto <br />Highway 96 from Snelling, traffic from the intersection already backs up that far. Mayor <br />Harpstead responded that the goal is to try to get traffic from TCAAP on Highway 10 and keep it <br />off Highway 96. He stated that there is a need for the overall system to balance. <br /> <br />Another resident stated concern, why is it the City's responsibility to take an increase in traffic on <br />Highway 10 versus i-35W. Resident George Grenander stated that numbers get thrown around <br />regarding the intersection and its status within the County, State, etc. He stated that he heard it is <br />unfunded. He wondered if the recent fatal accident is causing the safety ranking of the <br />intersection to change. Since that accident involved a rear-end crash, why can't the State put in <br />flashing amber lights at the intersection. He wondered if that could be a solution instead of re- <br />doing the whole intersection at a high cost. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated that there is little money for roads, so many proj ects are unfunded. The <br />intersection has moved from 41 st (2001-2004) to 29th (2003-2005) on the states most dangerous <br />list. <br /> <br />Resident Pat Haick stated that the residents are hearing different information. He requested <br />clarification regarding MnDOT's position. Mayor Harpstead responded that in MnDOT's <br />Transportation System Plan, this is listed as one of the top four intersections needing safety <br />improvements. Chris Roy, Mn/DOT North Metro Area Manager, and Mark Goess, Area <br />Engineer, discussed the Mn/DOT rankings. They stated that they look at the dollar value for <br />crashes and create a list. They use the list for studying trends. They also study for appropriate <br />action to take to make it safer. They try to find solutions. Some other top 10 intersections are <br />being addressed currently on Highway 169. Several intersections are being reconstructed from <br />signals to interchanges. Bigger fixes are usually the only fix available. For county Road Band <br />Snelling, the solution identified is adding additional lanes, but typically interchanges are <br />necessary. In their opinion, at 10 and 96 the only solution for making it safer is an overpass. <br /> <br />Chris Roy, Mn/DOT, stated that Highway 10 and 96 is in the top 50 of MnDOT's list. He stated <br />that in the 1990's, when Highway 96 was turned back, there was discussion and it was <br />determined that grade separation is the best solution for the intersection. The Mn/DOT <br />Transportation System Plan looks out to 2030 to identifY projects. There is a safety category, in <br />which four intersections are listed as ones that Mn/DOT wants to address. Three of the <br />intersections are located along Highway 169, the fourth is Highway 10 and 96. Mn/DOT wants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.