My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4B, PC 07-029, Variance at 1455 Skiles Lane
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
02-25-08-R
>
4B, PC 07-029, Variance at 1455 Skiles Lane
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2008 12:09:50 PM
Creation date
2/21/2008 3:48:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Arden Hills Planning Cases
Planning Case No
07-029
Type
Variance
Description
Front yard setback encroachment
Arden Hills Planning Cases - Address
1455 Skiles Lane
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />applicant stated he didn't plan to make any changes in the garage and therefore <br />the problem illustrated by the architect wouldn't be addressed. <br /> <br />Matt Wessberg, 1455 Skiles Lane, stated he intends to use the garage for storage. <br />He stated he would like to replace the garage door and insulate it. He stated he <br />would like the new garage to be insulated as well. He stated the pipes that run <br />through the garage service the kitchen and is the trunk line for the heat. <br /> <br />Chair Larson inquired ifthere was plumbing and heating ductwork in that space <br />currently. Mr. Wessberg stated there is. <br /> <br />Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Holewa, to <br />recommend approval of Planning Case #07-029, Variance; Mathew & Ann <br />Wessberg; 1455 Skiles Lane, subject to the six conditions as listed in staffs <br />February 6, 2008 report. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson stated that the changes from the first submittal were <br />tremendous, and it would be more unappealing to have the addition to the east, <br />and the proposed addition towards the south is more appealing. She stated she <br />appreciates that the new deck is not cantilevered. <br /> <br />Chair Larson inquired if Commissioner Thompson was stating that the revised <br />application addressed the Planning Commissions previous concerns. <br />Commissioner Thompson stated she was. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />This Planning Case will be reviewed at the Monday, February 25, 2008, City <br />Council meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.