Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~HILLS <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />February 19, 2008 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Jim Willis, Interim City Administrator ~ <br /> <br />Royal Oaks Realty Earnest Money Refund <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />ACTION REQUESTED. I recommend that the City refund the $40,000 earnest money deposit <br />made by Royal Oaks Realty in June 2006 relating to the proposed purchase and development of <br />the former City HalllPublic Works site on Highway 96. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND. Royal Oaks Realty entered into a purchase agreement with the City on June <br />26, 2006 for the former City HallIPub1ic Works site on Highway 96. The City approved a <br />condominium style office project with a number of conditions on October 6, 2006. The <br />developer, prior to the closing date, informed the City that they were not preceding with the <br />purchase because of some of the development conditions imposed by the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Marcel Eibensteiner, President of Royal Oaks Realty, corresponded with the Mayor in a <br />letter dated January 3, 2008, requesting refund of the earnest money. The Mayor referred the <br />matter to your then acting City Administrators, Sue Iverson and Greg Hoag. They, in turn, <br />requested the City Attorney to review the request. He has done so, and his letter dated January <br />30, 2008 is attached for Council members only as it considered confidential - attorney client <br />privileged. <br /> <br />I have been in contact with Mr. Eibensteiner regarding his request and believe the interests of all <br />parties would be served by the City refunding the earnest money in exchange for a cancellation <br />of the purchase agreement and a mutual release of claims as provided in the attached document. <br />Mr. Eibensteiner also agrees with this solution. <br /> <br />The City Attorney as reviewed and approve the attached document. <br />