My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-08-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
03-10-08-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2012 5:13:17 PM
Creation date
4/4/2008 10:11:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Regular City Council Minutes
General - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
3/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - March 10, 2008 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that she would address the southern border of County Road 96 <br />later in the meeting and answer the questions brought up during the public inquiries. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated he would like to see the third sentence under MnlDOT Project, <br />City Perspective, to read: The City requests MnlDOT to review and implement measures to <br />reduce noise via noise walls, landscaping, and/or paving materials. <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that she would like MnlDOT to do this but if they did a <br />mitigation study and the study doesn't meet the standards, then the cost may be responsibility of <br />the City. The Council may want the report and to review all the information prior to making this <br />type of change. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated that this should be the responsibility of MnlDOT, not the City, <br />and he would like to see the final sentence in this section stricken entirely. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung agreed with striking the final sentence under City Perspective. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead stated that a second draft could be drawn up that considers eliminating the <br />last sentence or possibly suggests an obligation by MnlDOT for the noise mitigation. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead pointed out that there are restrictions on what the State funds can be used for <br />with noise mitigation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Grant stated concerns with MnlDOT and a noise abatement study. They may <br />come in and do a study then make a change and not do additional studies after the change has <br />occurred. He suggested the City should request the standards or guidelines that MnlDOT uses so <br />that the City is aware of what they are dealing with. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden asked Kristine Giga what the standards may be for sound mitigation. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer Giga stated that she did not know at this time. <br /> <br />Mayor Harpstead asked that Staff get the specific noise standard requirements. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung stated that because things tend to get complicated quickly, he would <br />suggest that the City needs technical expertise to assist them. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council, in regard to MnlDOT Project, Interstate 694-35E to <br />35W, that they would like to tighten the obligation portion of noise mitigation in the City <br />Perspective section. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden stated that in addition she would like to say that when the project does <br />come forward there would be other comments and that the issue with noise mitigation is not the <br />only issue the City has. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.