My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-08-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
03-10-08-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2012 5:13:17 PM
Creation date
4/4/2008 10:11:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Regular City Council Minutes
General - Type
Regular Meeting
Date
3/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
plan from MNDOT precludes requirements from the city then MNDOT is <br /> usually willing to reevaluate the study that reached those conclusions via <br /> a cooperative process. Here's an example of how things typically work: <br /> 1 . A city proposes an intersection along a section of roadway controlled <br /> by MNDOT <br /> 2. MNDOT reviews the geometrics and layout of the proposal via an <br /> Intersection Control Evaluation <br /> 3. Results of the Intersection Control Evaluation are presented to the city <br /> and plans adopted/adjusted based on the findings <br /> Mike also told me that it is possible that a section of roadway, such as <br /> Highway 10 from 96 to 35W, may have been previously evaluated as part <br /> of a broader study called a Corridor Study. In our case, it is possible <br /> that signalized intersections were recommended against as part of a <br /> broader Corridor Study. However, he said it is not unusual for such <br /> studies to be reevaluated based on new circumstances or requests from <br /> cities along impacted routes. He also said that these studies are usually <br /> done with involvement and input from the city. <br /> It's possible that you and other city officials may already be well versed in <br /> this whole process, but I wanted to pass the information along as <br /> potentially useful background info for ongoing discussions between the <br /> city and MNDOT. Mike did add that the area manager, Chris Roy in our <br /> case, should be familiar with any previously published reports and also <br /> responsible for initiating new reports if none exist or revisiting the old ones <br /> should new information or requests from the city require that action. <br /> I haven't heard Chris cite these reports in support of his conclusions, so <br /> maybe the issue could be raised with him and a request for a new or <br /> updated study submitted, especially considering the recent interest from <br /> the council in pursuing signalized access to TCAAP. <br /> If you are interested in speaking with Mike Gerbensky, his contact <br /> information is: <br /> Mike Gerbensky <br /> Signal Design/Lighting Design and Operations Manager <br /> 651-234-7816 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.